Symantec Privileged Access Manager Other Solutions Considered
MB
Muhammad Baber
System Administrator at Alghanim Industries
We are moving to BeyondTrust.
View full review »We had a project to review eight vendors and their PAM products: IBM, Hitachi, CyberArk, BeyondTrust, CA, Enforcive, Centrify, and Lieberman.
View full review »We looked at a few other solutions over the years but nothing was better than what we had. We are looking to the future to see if any new solutions might be as good or better and cheaper. Licensing costs do add up as we are adding more servers in our secure networks.
Buyer's Guide
Symantec Privileged Access Manager
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Symantec Privileged Access Manager. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
One of the goals for one of our projects this year was to implement Privileged Access Management. We tried different products in the market: Xceedium, CyberArk, etc. This is when we decided on Xceedium.
All were almost good, but CA's UI was much better. Performance-wise, CA was good. One of the advantages was Unix, which was not on CyberArk. It was more Windows-focused. We have been using Windows and Linux both.
When we started analyzing different products, CA was really good. They are more proactive every time.
They really worked hard in the PoC. They made sure all of our use cases are validated, and they would even provide us patches during our PoC.
View full review »We started out with eight different products and wound up doing an RFP with four finalists, and CA PAM was one of them. The other three were BeyondTrust, CyberArk, and Hitachi ID.
View full review »I don’t know about the evaluation of other products. I was not involved in that part of the process.
View full review »JO
TechLeadea1e
Tech Lead at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
We looked at CyberArk, BeyondTrust, ERPM and ObserveIT.
View full review »We did not evaluate different products. There was no choice for us. We didn't have a choice to evaluate other solutions because they mandated the use of this product.
View full review »No other options were evaluated because this PAM has made substantial gains in system integration, which outweigh industry choices.
View full review »We ran a PoC with CA and BeyondTrust at the same time.
View full review »My organization had a push to increase our security posture this year. One of the areas we're looking at concentrating on is the use and control of privileged accounts. We obviously looked at the feature functionality set; then cost, then ease of use with a proof of concept demo.
We considered Thycotic Secret Server and we looked at a ManageEngine product. Ultimately, it came down to a choice between the Thycotic product and CA's PAM.
View full review »After doing a little bit of research in the PAM market, there are not too many PAM players out there. Obviously, there is CyberArk but the other big player is CA PAM. I took a look at CA PAM. CA's rep gave me every reason to pick CA PAM over CyberArk.
CyberArk is harder to set up. You need a stand up infrastructure to back up CyberArk. PAM, on the other hand, is much more simple to use, and you do not need as many Windows servers to back it up as far as I know.
- According to the users who have actually used CyberArk and CA PAM, they have said that CA PAM is ten times easier to use and manage.
- Also, according to the users, CyberArk is only in the Windows area. They only control passwords in the Windows area. I am not sure how true that is, but that is a huge thing.
We also evaluated One Identity, Centrify and Microsoft PIM.
View full review »We went with it because of internal customer needs, the regulatory and audit requirements, ease of installation, and auditor funding.
View full review »There are not many players in this arena so there aren't many choices. IBM has a solution, but I don’t think they push it.
View full review »We also considered CyberArk.
View full review »AS
Asif Shaikh
Security Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We did not evaluate any other solutions.
View full review »For us, we mainly wanted a solution that worked in the scenarios that we were looking for.
We've demoed numerous products. After even just watching the demos we weeded some out. Then we actually brought a few in-house that we liked, and we did proof of concepts. We found out that some products just didn't work the way we wanted them to in our environment.
The reason we chose CA PAM is it worked in the scenarios that we wanted it to, and it just worked without problems.
View full review »We looked at about a half a dozen, and this one came out to be the best one. We filtered down.
View full review »We did a proof of concept with another solution.
View full review »We have been using IBM extensively because customers demand that we provide this option.
View full review »Yes, CyberArk. We found it too complex and with more features than one would probably need.
View full review »We did evaluate other solutions.
- We did a market research of Xceedium, before CA bought Xceedium Xsuite
- CyberArk
- Dell had a tool to do privileged identity management
- There's another company also, that starts with Cyber, but I don't remember the name
We evaluated these solutions, and Xceedium, which is now CA PAM, stood out.
View full review »We evaluated Hitachi ID PAM and IBM PIM.
View full review »No, I didn’t.
View full review »I didn't get involved in that evaluation, either.
View full review »We did not evaluate other solutions.
View full review »I personally have used RPM and think it is more user-friendly.
View full review »We evaluated CyberArk, BeyondTrust, and Dell.
View full review »We are a partner of CA. The tests were only executed for this product (CA PAM).
View full review »Before choosing this product, we did not evaluate other options.
View full review »It's confidential.
View full review »Before choosing this product, we evaluated CyberArk PAM.
View full review »We evaluated Sudo-AD and CyberArk.
View full review »I don't remember now, but we did a PoC for a few, but chose CA PPM (formally known as Xceedium).
View full review »No, I’m not from the sales department.
View full review »Other options were evaluated but I was not involved in that.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Symantec Privileged Access Manager
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Symantec Privileged Access Manager. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.