We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

SYSPRO OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

SYSPRO is #21 ranked solution in top ERP tools. IT Central Station users give SYSPRO an average rating of 6 out of 10. SYSPRO is most commonly compared to SAP ERP:SYSPRO vs SAP ERP. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 31% of all views.
What is SYSPRO?
SYSPRO enterprise resource planning (ERP) software supports the control, integration and synchronization of all aspects of the manufacturing process and accommodates both short and long production runs in several manufacturing environments. This single source solutionis compatible with computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS software), and it features several quality control measures. Most notable is the lot traceability function, which tracks raw materials through their entire life cycle, beginning with their receipt, manufacture and assembly, and moving on to their inspection, stocking and distribution. It also keeps track of expiration dates and certifications of quality. Another valuable feature of this mining industry software is the inventory management component, which accurately forecasts inventories by analyzing sales history and other factors. Several companies have implemented this software to improve their business operations, including U.S. Salt. They found SYSPRO's focus on the client/server environment and the solution's scalabilty as two reasons to implement this software. The software's combination of manufacturing, distribution and financial functions was enough to convince U.S. Salt that this was the right software for their company. The result for U.S. Salt was highly efficient operations that maintain inventory levels for on-demand shipments within three to five days. U.S. Salt also cited the usability of the software as a benefit. Their employees could easily use it and even personalize it for their work stations. SYSPRO is a global leader in ERP business software. With 35 years of experience in the industry, SYSPRO has gained the trust of more than 15,000 customers and has partnered with 1,500 ERP channels in 60 countries. SYSPRO has a 98 percent customer retention rate.
Buyer's Guide

Download the ERP Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: November 2021

SYSPRO Customers
Arctic Manufacturing
SYSPRO Video

SYSPRO Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
EL
Managing Director at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 20
A great choice for straight manufacturing, but not suitable for complex manufacturing models

Pros and Cons

  • "The Financial Accounting module, in general, is quite good. It is quite simple but powerful. Similarly, the Manufacturing functionality, including a multiple level bill of materials, is also quite useful."
  • "SYSPRO at the moment is lacking on the project side. There's a module called Projects and Contracts, and it's a poorly designed module. One of my clients is a project-based organization, and they're finding it extremely difficult to manage their business using SYSPRO, to the point that they're looking at alternative solutions. The Projects and Contracts module is not a very useful tool. It does project accounting reasonably well, but in terms of putting in proper structures, like a work breakdown structure and so forth, it's actually quite poor. Their design or their architecture for the Projects module isn't good enough. They need to redesign it and redevelop it. They have made improvements. However, the problem is that if you're building on a bad foundation, then your building isn't going to be very strong. That's principally their problem. Any heavy equipment company would have a requirement to keep their equipment available for production. In that sense, SYSPRO has no maintenance management functionality. There's also no functionality for field services management. These two functionalities are critical for places like mines or for heavy equipment manufacturers who service the aftermarket and so forth. From a product perspective, this obviously isn't a good place to be because they are sort of taking themselves out of the market for quite a number of industries. They are constrained to manufacturing and distribution."

What is most valuable?

The Financial Accounting module, in general, is quite good. It is quite simple but powerful. Similarly, the Manufacturing functionality, including a multiple level bill of materials, is also quite useful.

What needs improvement?

SYSPRO at the moment is lacking on the project side. There's a module called Projects and Contracts, and it's a poorly designed module. One of my clients is a project-based organization, and they're finding it extremely difficult to manage their business using SYSPRO, to the point that they're looking at alternative solutions. The Projects and Contracts module is not a very useful tool. It does project accounting reasonably well, but in terms of putting in proper structures, like a work breakdown structure and so forth, it's actually quite poor.

Their design or their architecture for the Projects module isn't good enough. They need to redesign it and redevelop it. They have made improvements. However, the problem is that if you're building on a bad foundation, then your building isn't going to be very strong. That's principally their problem.

Any heavy equipment company would have a requirement to keep their equipment available for production. In that sense, SYSPRO has no maintenance management functionality. There's also no functionality for field services management. These two functionalities are critical for places like mines or for heavy equipment manufacturers who service the aftermarket and so forth. From a product perspective, this obviously isn't a good place to be because they are sort of taking themselves out of the market for quite a number of industries. They are constrained to manufacturing and distribution.

For how long have I used the solution?

I'm a consultant, and I've had two projects for this solution. I was on one project for about 18 months and on the other one for about 12 months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's quite a mature product, so it's quite stable. Once it works, it doesn't require a lot of support, which is a good thing. Solutions like SAP take a huge amount of support. SYSPRO is quite light on the support in comparison to SAP.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

If you use it for what it was designed for, it's absolutely scalable. You generally don't get users who have thousands of licenses. I think the biggest license in the country is for around 360 concurrent users. That would probably mean 600 or 700 users, which is not a small number. Therefore, it is quite scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

SYSPRO is quite well set up to support its very large customer base. Their technical support is fine. It isn't an issue at all.

Their technical support is also quite prompt. They have a partner model. In general, you would have an agreement with a partner. The first line support is mostly handled by the company itself. The second and third line support is handled by the partner. Whatever the partner can't solve, it escalates to SYSPRO. I've not seen issues that required urgent attention and were not rectified in a timely fashion. Their support model works well.

How was the initial setup?

It's reasonably straightforward to set up. It took roughly about six months to get an initial implementation going. Six months would be adequate to complete a project from start to finish.

What other advice do I have?

SYSPRO is quite a widely used ERP. It was developed in South Africa about 30 years ago or maybe more. It has got around 17,000 clients globally. It is quite a substantially used product. 

I'm an independent consultant. I try to be product-agnostic wherever I can. I have recommended SYSPRO for a family-owned business with maybe 300 million rand turnover or so. SYSPRO was the better choice for them because they had budget constraints and so on, and their implementation partner was strong. 

I certainly would recommend SYSPRO, but I think one needs to be very careful. If you are a straight manufacturing company that distributes your product through wholesalers and so forth, it is a great choice. If you have a more complex manufacturing model, like manufactured-to-order or designed-to-order, where you require Projects functionality, then it is not the right solution for you. At this point, this is the side that lets SYSPRO down.

I would rate SYSPRO a six out of ten in terms of other comparable products. For straight manufacturing, either process or discrete manufacturing, SYSPRO is fine, but when there is a requirement for more complex manufacturing models, SYSPRO probably isn't going to be the best solution.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner