I used the free version of TeamViewer. 

TeamViewer pricing is reasonable. 

It's licensed by simultaneous controlling tech, rather than by the device. I like that because previously it was always a struggle to keep the device list maintained. If we got rid of a device and we didn't remove LogMeIn properly, the device would remain in our LogMeIn Central account and use a license.

That's not a problem with TeamViewer's licensing, plus you can have as many techs as you want, but it monitors their simultaneous remote control usage with Hosts.  It can be a little tricky in the sense that you have to plan for the maximum simultaneous usage during busy times, and initially I didn't purchase enough licenses, but when we started hitting the limit, TeamViewer detected that and sent emails notifying us, then our sales rep very quickly added another license (allowing us to pay later via purchase order) to get us back in business.

In our environment, TeamViewer turns out to be less expensive than LogMeIn, at least so far.  We’re currently saving about 30 percent on licensing costs, and we don’t have to worry about maintaining/pruning the list of machines in the LogMeIn. TeamViewer's automatic emails telling us that we've hit the simultaneous limit includes stats on how many times it has happened recently, which helps in deciding whether to purchase an additional license.

This type of licensing does have a downside:  with LogMeIn, my staff were accused to controlling a client or a server and staying connected as needed, sometimes for hours if they were doing maintenance on a server or assisting a user with an intermittent issue.  But with TeamViewer, that chews up a simultaneous-use license and drives additional licensing costs, so we all have to remember to disconnect from Hosts.

I used the free version of the product. I did not need to pay any licensing fee. 

I can't speak to the exact cost of the product. I'm not sure how the licensing process works. 

Every now and then, I hear people complain, "Oh, it's pretty expensive," because it will cost you $1,500 to $1,600 a year, but when I think of how much work I do through TeamViewer...

We have an annual subscription that is just under $1,900 with no additional costs. We get these promotions about upgrades and stuff like that, but we haven't had a need to add more seats. Users can also use TeamViewer for home use with a non-commercial free license.

The cost of the licenses depends on how you buy them. They just had a buy one get one free deal going, and they do that every once in a while. Where you buy one license, and they will give you the second one free, or you can try to get discounts. Most of our licenses that we have we tried to do something like that just to save some money. 

A rough estimate of our user cost is $500 per user annually. It is very cheap.

About a year ago today, an add-on channel was $232 dollars, but that was pro-rated because it was at the end of the month.

The only issue that I ever did have with it, and this was quite awhile back, was we were trying to get one of our licenses applied to a user. Because it was a user who had a license and we had previously removed it, then we wanted to give it back to them, and for some reason TeamViewer kept saying that the user already existed. We were like, "Well, no, that person left, and now, they are back again. " However, we threw them an email, and they fixed it. They said, “Try it now,” and it worked.

I do not handle the licensing aspect of the solution. My understanding is the pricing is reasonable. Everything is included in the price. There are no add-ons. 

We have a corporate license. The maximum amount number of users changes based on the amount you pay. E.g., with our license, there is a maximum amount of users who can use the solution at the same time (10 users). 

The cost is in the thousands of dollars per year.

TeamViewer offers a free version to try. Download and give it a shot. See what it's like and if you like it, then buy the license for it.

We tell people not to license TeamViewer internally, but they can download it. The product is not quite organized for distribution.

It does what I need it to do but I think it's expensive. It wasn't easy for me to get approval from the company to get it. Not a whole lot of people in our company use it, but the five or six of us who do use it get a lot out of it.

It's costing us about $700 a year, per license. For the company it was $2,000, and that was on a deal. I think it would have been $2,200 or $2,300. 

I also got it for a friend who was working remotely. At the end of his year's subscription to TeamViewer, he wasn't using it much anymore. He was using something else. He called them to tell them that he did not want to continue with it for another year, but they said, "No, you didn't give us the 30-day buffer at the end of the year which is required to cancel for the coming year, so there's no way you can cancel now." They wouldn't let him out of the contract. He didn't read the fine print. We then read the fine print it did say that you have to give that number of days' prior notice before you cancel at the end of the year. If you don't give them that prior notice, you're stuck. I didn't like that.

I've looked at other companies that provide the same type of thing and their pricing is about the same.

There is no license needed to use TeamViewer.

I don't have any visibility of the cost of the solution. It's not an aspect I deal with directly.

Using this solution does not require any license plan. It's just a soft application which we are going to install on our systems.

TeamViewer was willing to give us a one-year package. Whereas, a lot of the other companies that we explored were paid by the month or quarter. It's just easier for our finance people at the college if we can make a one-time yearly payment.

TeamViewer has multiple licensing options. 

The price was cheaper than what we were previously paying. At the time that we went with TeamViewer, we were using ShareConnect. The TeamViewer package was about half the cost and able to have a bigger number of users.

I don't handle the licensing. I can't speak to the costs. However, my understanding is that it is reasonably priced. 

The solution may be free to use. However, I’m not 100% sure on this.

After trying free version, you can buy proper license. 

I am using the free version only. I've never had to buy their license.

The pricing and licensing are sort of high. Having been an early adopter of the subscription model, and primarily because version 11 was the last licensed version that I owned, when I was looking at 12, I was also looking at upgrading to corporate. I called TeamViewer sales and talked with them. At that point, subscription was a relatively new option. It was not even mentioned on the website at that time. However, it was pretty easy for me to look at my historical TeamViewer purchases in my accounting software and see that I was buying a new TeamViewer license every time a new version came out. So, switching to a subscription model wasn't going to be anything different than what I was already doing, so renewing the subscription every year was not any different than buying the upgraded version every year. There was good incentive to move from the middle tier to the corporate tier.

I don't use the commercial version. The version I use is free.

It would be nice if it is cheaper.

We are using the standard free version of TeamViewer.

There is a free version that has limitations, such as the time of the session with be terminated after a set timeframe. If you buy the license, it's a very good tool for monitoring and for remote access. There are a number of functions you can do with it. When you have virtual teams and they are across remote areas, it provides a means of collaboration. That's why it is very good.

There are many other options available, such as PCAnywhere. Many of the larger and multinational companies deploy these types of solutions.

The price of the license could be less expensive.

TeamViewer is expensive, and you get a limited number of connections for your money. We've now switched to AnyDesk, which is free, because the price of TeamViewer was too high.

I don’t have any visibility in terms of licensing costs.

We have the corporate license. It's extremely cheap.

For what we utilize it for it's not a super-expensive license. It was about the same or a little bit cheaper than LogMeIn but it's more stable and a better program for what we need in our company.

I used the free version of TeamViewer.

The licensing on offer is reasonable.

I don't have any insight into how much the solution costs. 

I think the price is reasonable. When a company develops software, they are creating a product. The purpose is to help people and also to make money. With this in mind, TeamViewer has a good price because you can still use it well without running into any issues. 

You can get a trial version but you cannot use it for free forever. If you are using the free version, you will have some limitations.

There is a free and paid version of this solution. I am currently using the free version.

There is a subscription option for licensing the product.

The price could always be a bit less.

The licensing is pretty straightforward: number of devices and number of remote administrators.

I am using the free version of TeamViewer. There is a subscription fee to use the premium features.

I think it’s a top product, but due to our company size, we find the pricing heavy… Nevertheless, as long as it remains number one, we have to grumble and get on with it.

We are using the free version of TeamViewer.

The version of the solution we are using is free.

TeamViewer is affordable and also features a limited free version to test it out.

We use a paid version. The free version has some limitations and you're not able to make voice calls.

We are not using the solution for commercial use therefore it is free to use.

TeamViewer's price is cheaper than some other similar solutions. We have licenses for our users.

The price is reasonable. However, it doesn't seem that anybody in my company wants
to spend.

There is a free version. Try it out. You will like it. Then, at the end of the trial, make the purchase at the tier that fits your needs. You can always scale up.

We have a permanent license and the price is reasonable. 

We use the free version of TeamViewer.

The free version is great to get started with and for a lot of people, it might be all that is needed. If you are going to be using multiple machines with multiple connections, you’ll need to consider the enterprise version.

Be sure you are compliant in licencing and choose the version which is suitable for your needs.

Noncommercial use: Free.

Commercial use with only a few (paying) customers: It depends on the amount of time you use TeamViewer and what the customer is willing to pay.

Commercial use: Prices of the licenses are somewhat high but ROI can be achieved very quickly in many cases.

We projected to purchase the licenses for the IT team to have the full-version while the rest of the users would only have the host version. In the end, we purchased five user licenses for the full version.

The solution has a pilot feature that is expensive. The overall price of the solution can be cheaper.

We have licenses for three technicians, and all clients in the company were supported. We have three licenses for the IT technician and we support 100 PCs connection when it's needed.

The pricing structure under which I purchased has been great because as long as the remote and host computers are running the same version, there is no need to upgrade.

Pricing is on par with competitors, but still a bit high for what the service actually is.

TeamViewer is a professional, flexible solution and platform independent, so it's worth it's price.

Our customers use the free version, as they rarely need to use it.

I am using the free version of TeamViewer

We are using the free version. We do not pay any licensing fees.

I wouldn’t be able to judge this, as I use the free version for personal purposes. My manager has arranged the professional version for business purposes.