Reducing the number of application-related attacks and consolidating them into a standard platform would be highly beneficial. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not. It would be advantageous to have a more sophisticated detection system to identify and address all types of attacks promptly.

The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly. The solution should provide easier access to dashboards and reports.

The solution should offer different controls. The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers. 

The dashboard could be more user-friendly. They should add more functionality to it. 

I'd prefer if they shared more pricing information

For the OWASP there is a predefined dashboard but a detailed report template would have been perfect . The report customization needs to be better. It can be more flexible in the customization. Additionally, the API Scanning features can be improved.

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not very user-friendly and you need a lot of information to get proper reports. The tool's support is not very responsive. 

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning conducts a general scan, which wastes time. The scan needs to be specific. 

It isn't easy to manage vulnerabilities in Tenable. 

The platform's technical support services could be better.

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning could improve by offering faster fuzzing.

It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly.

We had some trouble integrating with ZeroNorth that required we contact technical support. This is an area that could be improved.

We are currently running several different scanners and it would be nice to see all of them in one place. For example, Tenable.io is used for assets, whereas we have different solutions for mobile and websites. Having all of these integrated into a single dashboard would be helpful.

They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap.

The reporting in Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not as good as the reporting in Tenable SC. Tenable SC's reporting is extremely powerful.

The reporting has a very limited customization capability. It would be beneficial if this feature could be enhanced.

I would like for them to add intervening proxy, whereby you can alter the get/put requests. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing traffic packets which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail.