TestRail by Gurock Pros and Cons

TestRail by Gurock Pros

HashemAlhariri
IT Testing Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
The most valuable features are the flexibility, ease of use for writing new test cases, the test plans, and the composition.
View full review »
Stuart Barker
Test Manager at Zest Consulting
The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful.
View full review »
MT
reviewer1154316
Quality Assurance Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're paying for.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about IDERA, SmartBear, Hiptest and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ioana Haralamb
Project Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it.
View full review »

TestRail by Gurock Cons

HashemAlhariri
IT Testing Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language.
View full review »
Stuart Barker
Test Manager at Zest Consulting
It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools.
View full review »
MT
reviewer1154316
Quality Assurance Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about IDERA, SmartBear, Hiptest and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ioana Haralamb
Project Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
I've encountered at some point, some difficulties on the administration side, but I don't remember exactly what they were.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about IDERA, SmartBear, Hiptest and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.