TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Pros and Cons

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Pros

Head of Business Integration and Architecture at Jakala
For specific situations this can be a good solution and a simplified interface to work with.
View full review »
KC
Technical Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO.
View full review »

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Cons

Head of Business Integration and Architecture at Jakala
The product is missing some means of addressing more complex BPM constructs and should interface with more platforms easily.
View full review »
KC
Technical Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about TIBCO, Camunda, Apache and others in Business Process Management. Updated: May 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.