The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link.

Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed.

I'm still testing their meshing capabilities. The indoor products are great, but I'm trying to see how well their outdoor meshing works.

Their ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with. I'm at a point where I want to do almost a hundred-device order. So, I'm gonna try to reach out to Omada directly.

In terms of improvement, I would like Omada Access Points to be more versatile and adaptable across different industries. For example, it could be used in shopping malls to provide Wi-Fi and offer features like automatic notifications and shop promotions when you enter. It can help businesses by giving special deals to loyal customers, offering a modern way of shopping compared to the usual online methods.

Omada Access Points currently offers relatively basic managing tools, which are suitable for beginners and provide a good user experience. There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities. These improvements should include more options for managing users, connections, and general device connections, to provide greater availability and meet the needs of a broader range of users.

The price of the solution is an area requiring improvement since I want the solution to be made available at a cheaper price than its current market price.

Regarding the Omada Access Points, apart from upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7, I don't have any specific ideas for further improvement.

The technical support could be improved.

The GUI is quite good, although there's still room for improvement in that regard.

The solution takes a long time to switch to another connection, which should be improved. The solution’s stability and performance should be improved.

It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable. 

We're like to have more visibility in terms of who is connecting to the service. That would help us to monitor bandwidth more effectively.

There should be more remote support for the mobile application.

Aruba has better scaling capabilities. 

The quality of the hardware needs to be improved.

TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it.