Tricentis qTest Previous Solutions
We used Micro Focus ALM but switched to Tricentis qTest because upgrading Micro Focus ALM requires reinstalling and setting up all the users again, which requires admin rights. In our company, providing admin rights was challenging because of the number of users.
Performance-wise, we also found Micro Focus ALM lacking because it's slow, and users complained a lot about waiting for some time before they get to the next page. We also didn't find Micro Focus ALM user-friendly.
Those were the critical factors that made us switch to Tricentis qTest.
View full review »I previously worked with Micro Focus Quality Center, which may now be under OpenText or another entity. The reporting functionality and the seamless integration with various solutions out of the box are noteworthy aspects. Quality Center is a comprehensive ALM tool, that enables requirements management within the platform. In contrast, in qTest within Cisco, there's a reliance on importing features from external sources, especially in agile projects where qTest appears to be superior. The key difference lies in reporting preferences, with a personal inclination towards liking the key test reports better, although in large organizations, these reports might necessitate some filtering.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Tricentis qTest
February 2024
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis qTest. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2024.
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.