Tricentis Tosca Other Solutions Considered

NibsMishra
AVP, Testing Service Owner at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
We work with Accenture, Cognizant and Tara. They are our global service providers. We did an RFP, but Accenture only put Tosca on the table. They didn't give us any other options for scriptless. We went online, went to some conferences, and talked to people who are using Tosca. We did industry-review research and the like that. But in the end, we were able to prove out Tosca and that's the reason we went with it. View full review »
reviewer1215411
Global QA Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We evaluated SmartBear, HPE QTP (now UFT), QuerySurge, and Alteryx. It was very apparent that Tosca was an all-in-one solution. We could do database testing, UI, and API testing. The others focus on one area. HPE and SmartBear focus on things such as UI/UX interface-type testing, while Alteryx and QuerySurge focus on backend database testing. Tricentis encompasses all that and that's why we selected them. View full review »
gagneet
Continuous Delivery Lead at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Yes, evaluated TestComplete, HP UFT ALM, Selenium / SpecFlow / Cucumber. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: February 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Manish Kum@r
Senior Technical Automation Specialist at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
I evaluated other solutions including both Selenium and QTP. View full review »
Robert Foerg
Project Manager at a logistics company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We also evaluated HPE, IBM Rational Functional Tester, and Ranorex. However, for us, Tosca was the perfect choice. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: February 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.