The implementation was handled by a local Indonesian partner. 

We used Tufin for the deployment.

We deployed the solution in-house. It was pretty straightforward to deploy.

We used Professional Services with consultants for the deployment.

We had a vendor or reseller with us, but they didn't have much experience with the size of network we have, so they were more listening in and trying to get experience while things were going on. I'm okay with that. At the end of the day, it was the Tufin guys who actually brought it all together.

We used a reseller and an integrator, and we are working with an integrator right now. They are G2 Deployment Advisors LLC.

We used Tufin for the deployment.

We had Professional Services hours. However, as far as getting the actual devices and scaling it out, that was all just me.

I think we will be using Tufin for the upgrades.

We used a partner of the vendor with seven of our team members for the implementation of the solution. They have to be skillful people.

We used WTT for the deployment. My coworker, Dorothy, had a good experience with them. They were engaged before I joined the project.

The rollout was accomplished largely with an in-house team. The vendor that we purchased it through provided a little bit of support, but very minimal. Then, there is the team who is doing implementation with a lot of the firewall rule changes. Booz Allen has been helping a lot with the rollout, as well. I have been helping to design the rollout and adoption.

For our current implementation, which is temporary, once we move the cleanup process from this implementation team to the permanent team that is when I will be performing the work. That is when I'll be a bit more involved.

We handled the setup in-house. We did not need to get any help from integrators or consultants. 

We used a consultant from Tufin, itself, for our deployment.

My team gives our customers an introduction to Tufin, helps with the initial configuration, and then the handover. If it is a large implementation we will use three people to assist.

We used an integrator and professional services.

The overall experience was very good. I liked it.

We did the implementation of the solution in-house.

I am an integrator. Sometimes, we have to use Tufin on the back-end.

We used a G2 reseller for our deployment and it was a good experience.

In-house with Tufin on-call ready to help.

Nexum assisted us with the deployment of this solution. They are good, and we use them for everything we can.

We handle the installation and configuration of this solution for our clients.

Since 2008, we have purchased products through a Value Added Reseller. Our VAR intercedes for us on annual maintenance (support and update) calculations, and helps with unexpected contractual problems.

In my previous company, I handled the deployment of this solution myself.

In-House

We did it internally ourselves, but with some input on architecture from Tufin's professional services.

We implemented it in-house but got assistance from someone with hands-on experience with the product.

We used engineers from Tufin for setup. They were responsive. They were experienced with the solution they sell.

We implemented this solution by ourselves. It took us one or two hours to install and deploy this solution.

We are using a reseller, but I'm not exactly sure how that relationship even works right now. It is really early. Our stuff has been bought and shipped. We are still trying to complete internal documentation, so we can start doing stuff.

Typically, we get a consultant for everything, however, this last deployment, in particular, seemed to be more challenging for the consultant and for the staff.

That said, our experience with the consultant was very good overall.

We are a reseller.

We used a reseller for the implementation. It was the first time for the reseller to do this implementation.

We used a consultant to assist with our deployment, and we had no problems.

Our in-house team handled the implementation and deployment of this solution.

We pretty much did everything on our own with a little bit of help from Professional Services. When it came to customization we did leverage some of their expertise. But most of the solution was rolled out in-house.

I deployed it. It was very easy. That was the one thing that we really appreciated about the product was the ease of deployment, the intuitive nature and that's what was one of it's strengths are. It came on an appliance, it was intuitive to deploy and it made it very beneficial.

A mix of Tufin Professional Services and in-house.

We used Tufin for the deployment.

We used G2 to assist us with our deployment, and they are great to work with. They're easy.

We handled the deployment in-house.

We implemented this solution ourselves.

Tufin's team helped us mainly with the Check Point stuff when we ran into some problems.

We did it ourselves. Tufin support helped us with the configuration.

We worked with Tufin Professional Services to do some deployment. Most of it was internal, in-house customization and put together.

It was already deployed when I started working here, and it was a change for me, but it was straightforward. Most of the guided stuff was internal to the company. The architecture is not good but that’s got to do with the architecture on our side.

We are an integrator, so we have a fairly decent understanding of the product and it wasn't that difficult to deploy.

Most of the work was done by us. However, we worked closely with Tufin support, and we have good things to say about that.

Well when we first started, it was through a reseller. Then, as we're bringing in SecureChange, we have been doing it all that ourselves.

The reseller was Structured Communications, who is in Portland. It was part of a package deal that we built with them. Our experience with them was good. We used them a lot.

The implementation was so simple we did it ourselves without too much help from our partner company, so I can say that it was easy for us to adopt the solution.

We did most of the onboarding ourselves. 

We used Tufin for the deployment. We had a positive experience with them. 

We deployed it ourselves.

We hired people that have done the deployment in the past. So, we did it all ourselves.

I was not part of the implementation.

We handled the deployment of this solution internally.

We deployed it in-house. 

We used a reseller for the deployment. Our experience was not that great, which has more to do with how our supply chain works and why we picked them. However, I don't ever really talk to them or hear from them.

We deployed it in-house.

Implementation was easy. The previous solution we had didn't really work. We brought Tufin in, got it working, and rolled it right out.

We implemented it ourselves with our in-house team. It was easy.

Vendor was quite good. This is a tool with which the need to understand your network is mandatory. You must have an in-house team to be fully operate this tool. This is also the easiest for support.

We implemented this solution in-house with the support of Tufin Professional Services.

It was Tufin only and one or two guys within our team. There was no third-party involved.

We implemented it with our in-house team.

We handled the deployment in-house.

We bought deployment services from Tufin. 

We didn't really do the deployment ourselves. So, it was someone else.

We've implemented with just our in-house team since the initial setup.

We used a boutique software with services at the time. For most of our onboarding, we did everything ourselves.

We implemented through a consultant from Tufin, who was helpful.

I went through one upgrade, but they already had Tufin when I arrived.

We did it ourselves. Just looked at the PDF.

I was working directly with Tufin's sales team and SEs.

Our partner/reseller installed it for us.

We implemented it ourselves.

In-house.

We used a reseller for the deployment. They were very good.

We used a reseller, who was fine to work with.

We implemented it with our in-house team.

We deployed it ourselves. 

We implemented it with our in-house team.

I did it in-house, but tech support helped me walk through it and find missing pieces.

We used an integrator for implementation because I have a colleague who has a lot more experience than me and we worked together to manage that solution.

The setup is complex. I think Tufin is a big product.

My impression is it's relatively easy, but I don't know about the first time.

I used a partner for the integration, who was very good to work with.

We implemented it with a partner's assistance.

We implemented it with a partner.