Tufin Stability

Arturo Morante
Network Architect at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
I haven't found any issues with the stability. In the beginning, it was our problem, our mistake, because we configured the box with eight gigs of RAM. Then we checked and, obviously, we needed 16. After enlarging it to 16, there was no issue whatsoever. It was pretty responsive. Obviously, it was only one user, me, doing things, but I didn't find any issues performance-wise or stability-wise. View full review »
Robert Letson
Director at Visa Inc.
It seems stable. We've had problems always with the same box, which is our SecureTrack primary. We are probably on our seventh one. The last one, Tufin took it to their site. They shook it out, tested it, and beat it up, then gave it back to us. Since we were already on the standby box, we just had it up there running. It was in the HA cluster. As soon as somebody did some switch work, it failed over. Within a couple of hours of being on that box, it crapped out. View full review »
Reviewer45759
Change Manager at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
The Tufin products seem very long-term oriented. The ability to be customized seems good. It seems like there is a good roadmap for what features need to be added. We did a USP upload earlier this week into SecureTrack, and the upload process was okay. Some of the definitions around the columns and the formatting could be more clearly defined. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Tufin, AlgoSec, FireMon and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
NetworkS2695
Network Security Operations at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
We do have an ongoing issue with capacity. If one of our resources is working on it, nobody else can do anything. If a particular report is being run on the server, nothing else seems to work. We haven't done anything about it as of yet. Maybe some of my team members have opened tickets to Tufin for it. View full review »
NetworkS2260
Network/Security Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 51-200 employees
If you have a normal load in Tufin it works perfectly fine. But they need to work on the stability because if a certain amount of load is put in Tufin it just breaks downs, from what I've seen lately. That has to be taken care of. The parameters for the platform also matter in that situation, but if they can work on the stability, that would be great. View full review »
Ben Stern
Service Engineer at G2 Deployment Advisors
I haven't run into very many issues with stability. HA is the only weak point that I've seen. In the past, a lot of the HA upgrades had to be done separately. Recently, I had an HA upgrade that failed during the process, and we had to restore from a backup. View full review »
Michael Utech
Network Security Engineer at Customer Worldpay
The stability is solid. View full review »
Syahrul Fitri
Specialist in Network Security Operations Support at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The stability is great. It has never gone down. The only problem is the slowness. The stability is dependent on the devices. The part where we are having a problem now is the result of migrating to RAT which is using APIs which keep going down when our MDS has a heavy load. View full review »
NetworkEccd3
Network Engineer Lead at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
It is a very stable product. There have been a few times where we have had to call support and have something fixed. It has happened, but it's very rare. View full review »
Security8043
Security Analyst at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
The stability is pretty good. We have run into repeat issues with Palo Alto Panorama, where it doesn't seem to play nice if we change the vice group names in Palo Alto or if one of the Palo Alto servers is down, but it is in Panorama, because we're pulling everything through Panorama. Sometimes, it'll freak out and cause everything else to stay and be unable to get configed. Then, our Palo Alto products will sort of cease, usually a good majority of them, which is not ideal. View full review »
NetworkE78f6
Network Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
The solution is very stable so far. Within our environment it doesn't cause major outages. There have been a few instances where we did run into issues but they were things that we could fix relatively easily, with less of an impact to the business. View full review »
John_Ford
Managing Director at Midpoint Technology
We have found that this solution is quite stable. We do have some RFPs in to increase performance capabilities, but from our perspective, it's quite stable. If this were not true then our largest companies would not be buying the product. View full review »
NetworkE9856
Network Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Stability has been rock solid. We were joking about that last night. There was a good amount of time where we weren't running reoccurring backups on a couple of our older appliances. They ran into no problems, whatsoever, for hardware or software for years. So, we were sort of joking, "The product's so good that we don't even have to back ours up half the time." Thus, stability has been very good for us. View full review »
Nathan Hulsey
Firewall Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
My impression of the stability is positive. We haven't had any issues. We even went through an upgrade about a month ago and it was a smooth process. View full review »
Tch32Dr8392
Technical Director at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
So far, the stability has been reasonably good. We haven't encountered any major issues. Even when integrating to overseas central management systems, it has been quite seamless. View full review »
William Temple
CyberSecurity Supervisor at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
This solution is very stable. Once we got to a certain release, somewhere in version R18, it was stable. Before that, it would slow down after about a week or two of running and would cause us to have to restart the system. View full review »
ManagerOc5c3
Manager of Security Engineering at Global Payments inc
I have seen some issues with the stability. One of the things that we noticed was when R18 was released about one or two years back, it couldn't discover the newer versions of firewalls, then we had to upgrade it. After the upgrade we ran into some other issues. However, it looks like with the patches it is getting there. View full review »
Tom Loeber
Services Engineer at AccessIT Group
The stability is very good, especially now that they are developing a lighter weight operating system on top of the OS with 2.0 coming out this year. The current version is slow. I deal with a lot of large environments, which is mostly what Tufin has. It is slow because it is a database, Tomcat Server, and web server. Reports are slow. If you're generating manually on the fly, you can set them to run at night, then it's not a big deal. View full review »
Shaun Slatton
Automation Engineer at Cox Communications
So far, our impressions of stability are not very good. We have already had to RMA one of our boxes, and it was not being utilized very heavily. We've had different issues on some of our other devices, as well. View full review »
Arnold Adu-Darko
Infrastructure Engineer Specialist at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Tufin is very stable, and I would say that there are no major outages. Sometimes the connection between Tufin and the management servers gets broken, and I don't know the reason, but apart from that, it is very stable. View full review »
Mahendra Neopane
User at Daimler AG
Tufin is very stable. There have been no major outages. Sometimes there is an SSL correction between Tufin and the management server. Sometimes it gets broken but I don't why. Apart from that, it is very stable. View full review »
Jeffrey Belanger
Security Consultant at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
This solution is stable. We don't have any issues with it, but it's a resource hog. View full review »
NetworkEae6b
Network Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
So far, the stability has been great. One of my colleagues just did an upgrade from the previous version to 19.1, which had a bit of database issues. Those have now been resolved. View full review »
Associate8c2
Associate Director Program Management at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
We haven't really overburdened it yet. What we have has been very stable. There have been no issues that I have seen. View full review »
Mohd Majmi Mohamad
Regional OSH at Pos Malaysia Berhad
So far we have had no issues. We're running it on a VM and there are no issues with the VM. View full review »
Managerfac3
Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
So far, stability has been good. View full review »
InfoSecC1266
InfoSec Consultant at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
This is a pretty stable solution. I won't say that there are no issues, but it does what they say it's going to do. View full review »
Securitya49e
Security Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees
Overall the system is stable, and we have had no issues configuring it with our firewalls, or otherwise. View full review »
Samuel Taxis
Information Security Engineer at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The stability works, for what we've been using it for. The system has been up and running for at least a year and a half without any issues. The only time we do anything with it is when we upgrade it or patch it, but we have never had any performance issues or it falling over. View full review »
John Fulater
Security Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
It is a very stable product. View full review »
Ed Aguila
Senior Network Engineer at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
This solution is solid, as far as I can tell. View full review »
Joseph Yanacheck
Security Compliance at Caterpillar Inc.
For the most part, stability is alright. It works well until we do an update and it breaks everything. But, it gets fixed, and it's good again until the next update. View full review »
Networki9624
Networking Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
In the sense of operating, the stability is good, but in the sense of performance efficiency, it is bad. View full review »
NetworkS6585
Network Security at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
The solution is very stable. We've upgraded several times and not had any issues. For stability, it's perfect. View full review »
Shawn Babinyecz
Cyber Security Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
It's pretty stable. I haven't had any issues with it. View full review »
Securitye949
Security Engineer at Allegiant Air
It has been very stable. Though, the policy browser has had trouble working. We have experienced bugs. View full review »
Infrastra69d
Infrastructure Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
So far, the stability of the solution has been good. View full review »
David Higgins
Senior IT Analyst at Exelon Corporation
The stability of this solution is fine. We don't have any issues with it, at least as far as I know. View full review »
Consulta38b6
Consultant at Sirius Computer Solutions
It's very stable. We haven't encountered any major issues, so it's pretty good. View full review »
NetworkSc6b0
Network Security Analyst at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Stability is sometimes good, and sometimes not so good. There is an issue with all of our Palo Alto devices, where if one gets disconnected in Panorama, they all show as disconnected or with errors or wrong arguments, which is very generic. They are supposed to have a fix for it now, but we haven't implemented it yet, because they are not releasing it until eleventh of this month. View full review »
Security4691
Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
It's not a very stable product. It doesn't stay up as often as I would like. It crashes at very inopportune times that we just can't afford. View full review »
Jim Robinson
Senior Specialist at Cigna
In every instance that I've ever worked with it, it was stable. View full review »
ITManage3885
IT Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
For us, this product has been very stable. We don't have any trouble with it. View full review »
SrAdvisof832
Senior Adviser Cyber Security at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
It is pretty stable. We have more issues with the VMs than with the software. View full review »
Salvador Teran
Network Security at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The stability has been improved, even person by person. It is even stronger in a way. View full review »
SrInfoseb35c
Senior Information Security Architect at First Citizens Bank
We feel that it is a very good solution. So, we'll probably use it going forward. View full review »
TeamLeadc1d6
Team Lead of Border Protection at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
If you would have asked me two weeks ago, I would have said the stability was excellent. However, we had some upgrade problems. They were worked out and the support was excellent in helping us get it fixed. In general, the stability is very good. View full review »
Christian Myers
Consultant at Critical Design Analytics
We have had a couple issues with the VMs, but I think it was just because they were starving for resources. A recommendation on what the virtual appliances should have for resources would be appreciated. View full review »
Security7b20
Security Engineer at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
So far, the stability is good. View full review »
Viktor Vera
Head of IT Security at Banco Privado
The stability is okay. View full review »
HugoSanchez
Security Analyst at Equifax Inc.
The stability is very good. It's better than the other tools that we have in the company. View full review »
ITSecuri31c4
IT Security Analyst at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
It is very stable. View full review »
SrNetwor9adb
Senior Network Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The stability is a pretty standard. It is working, and not like other products where it is breaking the system. It is pretty stable. View full review »
Erik Johansen
Manager at PG&E Corporation
It is very stable. View full review »
Profferefb28
Professional Services Engineer at a tech services company
In terms of stability, the version I tested in the lab was okay. View full review »
SeniorCofe32
Senior Consulting Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Stability is good, so far it hasn't given us any trouble. View full review »
LeadEngia25d
Lead Engineer at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The product is stable. Regardless of the software we are running, the current or the new one, it is stable. View full review »
Security1d40
Security Analyst at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
The product seems stable from when we implemented it at the time. View full review »
NetworkS3480
Network Security at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Product seems to be stable. We haven't had any outages yet. View full review »
reviewer1188195
User
The tool is highly reliable. View full review »
reviewer1185804
User
I would rate the stability of this solution a nine out of ten. View full review »
Firewallcf07
Firewall Administrator Security Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
The stability is bulletproof. View full review »
Securitye57f
Security Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
We have had a ton of issues with stability. The database is weirdly designed. Things just go wrong with it where we have to call the tech guys. They come in and clean the database fairly regularly. View full review »
ITManage3885
IT Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
It has been very stable since 2017. We haven't had any power problems. As far as hardware goes, it's been very stable. In the software, we found some bugs, but we're working with support to fix them. View full review »
reviewer1185783
User
We have had no outages over the last six years, so this solution is very stable. View full review »
Marko Martin
Technical Team Lead at Paragon
It has been very stable since 2017. We haven't had any power problems. As far as hardware goes, it's been very stable. As for software, we found some bugs, but we're working with tech support to fix them, which is normal. View full review »
NetwEng3023
Network Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Stability is good. View full review »
ITSecuri46f3
IT Security Professional at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
The stability is fine. View full review »
ChiefInf4325
Chief Information Security Officer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
It is very stable. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Tufin, AlgoSec, FireMon and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email