The Ubiquiti is a rock and that's why we use them. It's the same as their WiFi equipment. The Ubiquiti hardware, though they're software, they don't bill you for it and their software is not as pretty as others. Their Iron is our rock which is more important than anything else to me. I can remotely fix software. I've got to go on site to fix hardware.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

I rate Ubiquiti UniFi Switches a nine out of ten for stability.

The stability is rock solid.

I've had stability issues. It's not the most stable solution. Meraki is better.

It is a fairly reliable but very stable solution.

Sometimes, there can be issues with the product, and users may need to work on the factory reset and deploy the solution again.

It is a stable product. That said, the problem we have is the homogeneity of the network. We're not sure if this is caused by Ubiquiti or some other device. 

The solution is very stable when you use it in an office environment. However, there's a distinction in stability when transitioning to the enterprise edition. This differentiation is crucial, particularly with the recent introduction of data-centre-grade products to the market earlier this year. When we initially ordered these switches, only the office branch was available. Consequently, our data centre's required data load exceeded the capacity of Ubiquiti switches. Due to the considerably higher data load, we had to distinguish between using them in an office environment and a data centre.

Ubiquiti switches reach their limitations beyond a network and internet capacity of approximately two GB synchronously.

The solution is very stable so stability is rated a nine out of ten.

We have not had any issues with the stability of this solution.

I have no issues with the performance of Ubiquiti UniFi Switches.

The equipment, in my opinion, is really good.

The stability is good. 

I've had the switches running for a couple of years now, and I haven't had any problems at all. 

So far, this solution has been completely stable. We have had issues with hardware and needed to exchange it at times, although we had the same issues with Cisco.

We are operating in Germany, and the rules here for when things fail are quite nice. We normally have a two-year warranty, and it is quite easy to exchange hardware with the dealers. Normally, if something is not going to function well, then it gives up within three months. There is no difference between Cisco and Ubiquiti in this regard.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches are stable.

The stability so far has been very good. No downtime, no outages.

I rate the tool’s stability a ten out of ten.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches are very stable. 

In terms of stability, I like it pretty well, though one of the ports on it went dead about two or three weeks ago. 

I am a little concerned about that, but it's not uncommon for a switch to have a bad port. I am keeping an eye on it to see if it continues to degrade or if I have only lost that one port. Apart from that, I am pretty pleased with it.

I rate the product's stability a nine out of ten. 

I rate the product’s stability a nine out of ten.

The solution's stability is very good.

I rate Ubiquiti UniFi Switches ten out of ten for stability.

We were not having any issues.

Ubiquiti UniFi Switches are stable. If you configure them properly, and they are in a proper server room with good cooling, they work fine.

UniFi Switches are very stable.

The stability of the solution has room for improvement. It could be unique to us, however, there's been some instances where it's very unstable. Instabilities are something that we've been striving to reduce ever since I got here and even before that.

I believe that it has to do as much with the environment that we're putting this hardware in. When you're in a facility where the temperatures get high, the humidity sky-rockets. If you don't have hardened equipment that is designed to handle that kind of very harsh environment, you will have problems.

I try and design so that we can mitigate without spending exorbitant amounts of money to do so. 

I used to sell systems to a crab fleet that fished out of Ballard Washington and go up to Alaska and we'd sell them two or three of the same systems because they'd rot. They'd throw them overboard and install new ones. It's that kind of environment that things get corroded because there's a lot of moisture. Therefore, the stability issues we face could be based on the fact that the environment is a questionable and uncontrollable factor.

The tool has been rock solid. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

The stability is very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable in terms of the performance on offer.

I rate the solution's stability a nine out of ten. 

It's stable.

Sometimes this solution works, and sometimes it doesn't. What I have found is that for two access points, it seems to be stable. Beyond that, with three or four access points, it doesn't work.

The solution is stable.

I've been using the solution for three months only, so I can't say if it is stable or not. But I've had no glitches or bugs so far. 

The solution is stable. Up until now, we haven't experienced any issues.

In terms of resilience, this solution seems to be okay. I just upgraded and it has been stable. We haven't had a failure in the 120 days that have passed since the previous upgrade.

The have found from my experience the solution is stable.

There was a point where I had to create cases with technical support because I couldn't access the Cloud Key. However, those issues seem to have been resolved with updates that have been done. At this point, it is running well.

It is not as stable as required. They improved the stability a little bit, but it still requires more stability.

This is a stable product and we plan to continue using it in the future.

We have had issues with stability.