Ubiquiti Wireless Scalability
There are some limitations on scalability. It's a great solution for smaller networks. On larger networks, little things start stacking up after a little while. They haven't been terrible, but I don't feel like Ubiquiti is a true enterprise-level wireless solution.
View full review »My impression is that this solution is scalable. There are about 400 users of this solution in our company.
View full review »My company doesn't have to deal with really big networks since our target is in the area of installation, but we never had a scalability problem with the product. If a user needs more of the solution for better coverage, our company can install a couple of more devices. There is absolutely no scalability problem.
Buyer's Guide
Ubiquiti Wireless
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Ubiquiti Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
HU
Henk Uittenbogaard
CEO at AnyWi Technologies
The solution is very scalable.
Our customers range from small to very large companies, and it can handle any size pretty much.
View full review »TW
ThomasWilke
CEO at CITOM
Scalability is one reason we use Ubiquiti. It's easy to scale up because of the centralized administration approach.
View full review »It is not very scalable.
We have six networking people using the solution.
We are not planning to increase Ubiquiti as we don't have good feedback regarding Ubiquiti Wireless.
View full review »Currently, Ubiquiti has no issues with scalability, so there are no problems in scaling that network and the conference off.
View full review »DP
Dev-Patel
Consultant at Lifeline IT
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Around 2,000 to 3,000 people in my company use the product.
The product is extensively used in my company. My company plans to increase the use of the product.
PM
Pedro Moreira
IT Manager at Decorgel
The platform is easy to scale.
View full review »The solution is suitable for small and medium businesses. We have 20-25 users in our organization.
View full review »BO
Boris Ormsby
Owner at IoT Integrativ Technologies
This is a scalable solution. I'd rate its ability to scale eight or nine out of ten.
View full review »SA
SarmadAlwakeel
IT Manager at Rotana Hotels
It is scalable within a certain range, but I think it's not for very big companies. If you install Cisco, for example, you can leave it to work 24 hours a day, seven days a week and it would go nonstop for two or three years without an issue. For Ubiquiti, I don't think that is possible.
It is a lack of hardware. The hardware is good compared to some other companies. If you comparing to Cisco, though, it's not as good. Cisco is much better at making hardware.
I have many friends using Ubiquiti. I also know may companies using Ubiquiti. In Iraq 75% use UDM products.
They have some products that can be used in both big and small companies. For the point to point application, there is a product that is very widely used in Iraq. You can advance, for example, one gigabyte of data through 23 megahertz to the user. It's called airFiber 11FX and it's very, very widely used in Iraq. There is also the 5X, 5U and 5XHD, and airFiber 24 and 24HD. I don't think Cisco has such a solution. This is why it's used in many companies, even on the enterprise level.
We also use their fiber internet to bring an internet connection to a place that is very far away from the town. So they use this product to get an internet connection.
View full review »GR
reviewer1906461
CEO at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
It is a highly scalable platform. I rate it a nine out of ten.
View full review »Ubiquiti Wireless is scalable. However, the number of access points should be determined.
When using Aruba ClearPass we discovered the controller is not talking to Aruba ClearPass, but every access point can communicate with the Aruba ClearPass. That means every access point is working alone but the controller only pushes the configuration to all access points. It is not really an access point controller.
We have approximately 1,200 people using the solution.
View full review »WS
Walter Shelver
Owner at CableWeb
Ubiquiti is highly scalable. I've seen Ubiquiti rolled out in massive setups and huge buildings. I know companies that run large warehouses, manufacturing, etc., and their whole backend infrastructure is Ubiquiti. They are pleased with it.
They function as well as Cisco core switching. Sometimes it just depends on the scenario, but from a scalability point of view, all Ubiquiti products work together.
I can mix old Ubiquiti access points, LR units, etc., with new Ubiquiti products. More recently, they've done things like Nano and Wifi 6. You can't mix the Wifi setups, but that's a technology issue, not a product issue. That allows a lot of scalability. Most of them don't reach layer 3 level on their standard switches, but most are layer 2. You have edge switching and layer 2. It's rudimentary networking.
My understanding is the solution can scale.
We have four or five people using the solution. It's just for home usage.
View full review »Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
In our company, twelve people use the product.
My company probably has plans to increase the usage of the product.
DB
Damnam BAGOLIBE
Security engineer at ARCEP Togo
It is a really scalable solution.
We have around 100 end-users. Maybe 20 are using the network, with the rest on wireless.
View full review »We have not had to scale Ubiquiti Wireless, but it would be easy if we decided to.
We have approximately 70 connections to Ubiquiti Wireless. We have approximately 60 phones and 10 laptops and other additional devices connected. All our departments are using this solution, such as our electrical and mechanical departments.
We are using Ubiquiti Wireless at half capacity in my company. In the future, we might increase usage, but this depends on if it is necessary.
View full review »Ubiquiti Wireless is not easy to scale. Scalability is a problem. Get your five AP (access points) and you're fine, but if you want to put 50 AP, you'll have a big problem. It's not scalable.
Another thing is from the management perspective with cloud keys and the way that they use cloud keys, it isn't scalable.
It's also not multi-tenanted, so you can't really use it. When you have multiple branches and sites, management becomes a big problem.
View full review »AS
Alwakeel Sarmad
CEO at Cybertek
The solution is scalable. It's very widely used in Iraq. Around 80% of people here use Ubiquiti.
View full review »The solution is scalable. It can expand well.
View full review »OD
reviewer1673337
CMO at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
The product can scale well. There's no problem with that. They work like Meraki and the device acts just make a mesh.
We have ten people in the organization that use the solution.
View full review »HB
Hansel Baro
Senior Site Reliability Engineer / System Administrator at a hospitality company with 51-200 employees
It is pretty scalable. It is easy to scale. Whenever we need more access points, it is easy to set it up.
We have roughly 200 users with mixed roles. We have engineering, finance, HR, customer service, and CEO. In terms of increasing its usage, we just upgraded last year. We are in a good position right now. If our company expands, we might add or upgrade our network.
View full review »WS
Walter Shelver
Owner at CableWeb
This is a very scalable solution. You can put in a bigger switch or change other components. No matter what you want to do, it's very scalable.
Ubiquity does not recognize somebody who supplies legacy switching. It declares mostly layer two. It is scalable to that level, but I think in most cases, if somebody is looking for a layered solution then they're going to go to a dedicated layer specialist like Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco, or HPE.
We have approximately one hundred and fifty to two hundred end-users for this solution between different companies.
View full review »Ubiquiti Wireless is very scalable. I don't know that there's a limit to scalability. We just add more data switches to power more access points. We haven't come across a situation where it can't handle the Ubiquiti equipment.
It's mostly used by guests or property owners. Management accesses the wireless network as well, but they don't have any role in managing it or maintaining it. We do all that. So, it's really just internet access for guests and homeowners.
The people doing the installation are basically just connecting the wires to the access points and mounting the access points. I think we had two installers and then one engineer that's just managing everything; they're logged into the interface and adopting the access points and setting up the network control.
View full review »MC
MichaelCinco
Information Technology Supervisor at JLR Construction and Aggregates Inc.
In terms of scalability, I cannot say at this time how it is. If it is a very small one, it may have one or two points only. We only have maybe three to four antennas. That's not very much. I cannot grade scalability with such a small deployment.
We have 20 users at a maximum on this product. They are all in operations. The engineering department doesn't use it that much.
In the advent of fiber, it's unlikely we will increase usage.
View full review »We've run into a few limitations in what we call large accommodation environments where we've got about 100 wireless devices, trying to do things with USG type routers, onsite controllers, where they run out of capacity. This could have been our technicians making incorrect estimates of what was possible, but we're having to put in small local service to do that function. It would be preferable to have everything occurring in the core router. When that happens, the core device is overloaded and it's difficult to access it remotely. That's been one of the issues we've run into as we've pushed the limit on the number of devices on a single site.
We maintain over 1,000, probably 2,000 devices with just three people.
This is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises and not more than that. It might not scale to the needs of very large companies.
We have up to 100 users at this time.
We will likely increase usage in the future.
View full review »CD
CandelarioDimas
System Engineer at DIMASOFT.NET
The scalability of the solution is good. Our clients are typically medium-size businesses. Our clients frequently tell us to install Aruba from HP, Cisco, or Juniper. They see this solution as best suited for small enterprises. We have to explain to them Ubiquiti is working on the security and stability of their wireless network.
View full review »EO
reviewer2021238
Senior Network Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
The solution is scalable. Approximately one thousand people are connected to it.
View full review »It is a scalable solution. We have approximately 15 users using this solution in private and 12 or 13 on guess connection. There are three people responsible for maintenance.
View full review »RM
reviewer1907949
IT System Technician at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
I have not yet experimented with the scalability of Ubiquiti Wireless.
I am using it at home.
View full review »JR
reviewer1480227
Technology Systems Manager at a educational organization with 51-200 employees
The solution is scalable. We recently added more access points and they integrated into the system very smoothly. We have over 1,200 users. We have a maintenance department of three network administrators who deal with Ubiquiti and any other tech matters.
HH
Harvey Halasan
IT Staff at Holy Name University
The scalability of Ubiquiti Wireless is very good. We can add and transfer access points, it is highly scalable.
We have approximately 2,000 faculty and 3,000 students using this solution.
View full review »DD
DImo Dimov
R&D Engineer IC Design at inLab Ltd
The product is scalable.
View full review »MZ
reviewer1449963
President at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The product can scale.
View full review »MN
Manish Nalawade
Owner at it logic
It's a scalable product. The scalable range is from five kilometers to forty kilometers.
Depending on the model, if we are providing Mbps, we are using a higher-end model of Ubiquiti and Mikrotik for users.
View full review »CS
reviewer1484211
Senior Security at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Ubiquiti Wireless is very easy to scale.
View full review »PC
Pierre Claver B Traore
Head, IT Division at USTTB
In my office, we have approximately 100 people using wireless. Not all of them are using the service at the same time.
View full review »HU
Henk Uittenbogaard
CEO at AnyWi Technologies
The most current version that we are using has scalable storage. The scalability depends on the equipment. They do switches now which helps balance the load. We are not using all the options at this point, but we are capable of using multiple access points.
So the product is scalable within certain limits. Some of those are what we place on our understanding of the product and the security.
DC
reviewer1026921
ICT Manager/Systems Administrator at a university with 201-500 employees
For a small deployment, they are very good. I haven't used them in a very large deployment, and therefore can't speak to its scalability.
That said, it's my understanding that you can definitely add more access points if you need to.
The latest deployment was for an office of about 20 people. It's not a big job by any means.
View full review »IC
reviewer1646865
ICT Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The scalability is very good. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so.
View full review »WS
Walter Shelver
Owner at CableWeb
It is very scalable. On a scale of a point, it depends on who you talk to, if you're going to talk to a hardened IT manager that has to look at security and anything like that, they're going to look at a layer three switch provider. It depends if you're doing any kind of financial institution. It depends on what you build as your backbone. However, from a scalability point of view, I think they're extremely scalable.
I've spoken to guys that run very big corporate networks, like Ford company for instance. Ford uses Ubiquiti as their backbone, so they're happy with the security and they're happy with the fact that it's only a layer two switch. Where somebody like a standard bank would not look at Ubiquiti because it only goes up to layer two capability. They'll put a layer three backbone in but they might use Ubiquiti's APs on that layer two backbone. It comes down to a matter of opinion. I have had other guys say to me that layer two is more than enough because of the way they've set up their network. It's a very interesting question but to be short, it is very scalable.
Everybody starts up- in the beginning, only small companies adopt it and then people slowly but surely will adopt it in a department or whatever else. But my point of view is that I've seen big companies, like Ford motor company use Ubiquiti to a large extent. We are actually about to embark on a very big network setup that's going to go to multiple countries. And we're definitely going to be using Ubiquiti as my wireless connection of choice.
I'm very very happy to do it like that. We've done a lot of research on it and I've still got people that have to do the final go-ahead on it. But eventually, at the end of the day, the choice is ours.
We don't need to do a lot of maintenance. It depends on the nodes. The nice thing about it is that most networks nowadays including Ubiquiti, depending on how your network is set up, all your access points can literally be monitored from a single point. I can have a thousand access points running and I can monitor them from a single point as long as my network is connected and on how your infrastructure is built. I have one network engineer monitor my wireless for multiple levels of my company.
I don't need a lot of people. When it comes to installation and whatever, you need a normal fateful installation team, it's not any more difficult or any easier than most APs to install. It comes down to normal network rules in what you do. You don't need so many network engineers to control different aspects of the network. Nowadays you need somebody to look after security, you need somebody to look after networking, you need somebody to look after software, you need somebody to look after hardware. At the moment the thing that's the most intense is desktop support and desktop maintenance. That's the thing that's the most intense. And thanks to Coronavirus, I think the adoption of remote monitoring, remote support and everything like that has just exponentially grown. Many more people are doing remote support. I think the world is very much going to be moving a lot in that direction over then the next two or three months.
RS
Ravikumar Subbiah
IT MANGER PAN-INDIA at Escon Elevator Private Limited
The solution is scalable. We have 100 people using the solution in my organization.
View full review »ER
EduardoRomero
MIT at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The solution is scalable. The eight-person IT department is using the solution as well as everybody else because they use wifi, approximately 32 employees.
View full review »MC
Mariusz Czarnecki
CEO at SoniqSoft JRMM sp. z o.o. s.k.
Ubiquity Wireless is scalable.
There are only 22 people in my organization that use this product but within our installation base, there are thousands of users.
View full review »KK
reviewer1028196
Health Information Services Systems Engineer at a performing arts with 1,001-5,000 employees
Ubiquiti Wireless scales very well.
View full review »IC
reviewer1454037
IT & Software Manager at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees
This is a scalable product.
View full review »SP
Steve Pender
Managing Member at Pender & Associates
It is scalable. We currently have 20 customers using this solution.
View full review »MG
reviewer1606617
Network Administrator at a real estate/law firm with 201-500 employees
Sometimes, I feel it's scalable. We have 500 users of this solution.
View full review »MZ
reviewer1449963
President at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The solution is very easy to scale. If a company needs to expand this solution, it can do so fairly easily.
View full review »EA
Eli Abitbol
Director at Existco PTY LTD
It's a very scalable solution.
View full review »IR
reviewer1392807
Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The scalability is quite good. If a company needs to expand out the solution they can do so easily.
We have a little less than 50 users on the solution.
We do plan to continue to use the product and may increase usage in the future.
View full review »OS
reviewer1126884
Principal Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
In terms of scalability, these wireless products are good. We have quite a few deployed services, and I would say more than 500 end-users.
View full review »BR
Badar Raqeeb
Team Lead at Comstar - Information Systems Associates Ltd.
It is scalable.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Ubiquiti Wireless
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Ubiquiti Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.