Pricing is expensive. 

If I would rate it with one being inexpensive and ten being expensive, I would rate pricing an eight out of ten.

The pricing is competitive. It is affordable and average. 

The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license.

The pricing of the solution is high. It's more than $10,000 per floating license. That's a yearly cost.

There are no additional costs on top of that, however.

It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items.

The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests.

Pricing is the biggest feature. When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less.

Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users. 

I think the cost of UFT is too high and obviously expensive, especially if you consider that there are other even better products, in my opinion, that are open-source. Because of the expense, we use UFT only with big companies. For a small company with a smaller budget, we can't choose UFT because UFT is very expensive.

Setup cost was around €10,000. Day-to-day processes would be 0 as the technical part of test automation will be integrated completely into development. This will save the extra part of technical test automation, which sums up to the yearly license costs.

Pricing depends on which model you choose. The cloud version has a monthly fee, whereas on-prem versions offer yearly or monthly fees. You can also purchase a permanent license. If your license expires, you will still be able to use the solution, but without support. 

The pricing and licensing can be a bit of a challenge. 

As far as comparing to other products, the licensing costs for UFT are very high. I don't remember the cost exactly. The maintenance of the service contract was very high as well and, frankly — compared with more modern tools — it was and is not worth it.

A good thing is that there are not any costs in addition to standard licensing fees, but the standard licensing fees are going to be high in comparison to other products so you don't gain anything.

The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another one.

I am not aware of the pricing.