OpenText UFT Developer ROI

Eitan Gold - PeerSpot reviewer
SQA Manager at Elmo Motion Control Ltd.

We have seen a return on investment. 

I would say try to accumulate the percentage I never thought about it, but I would say if we compare it to manual testing the return would be seventy percent.

View full review »
LQ
Systems Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees

The return on investment for an organization is that the more people use it, the cost per capita reduces. If we buy these two for one person it's a very, very expensive solution. However, if we buy this product for 10 people, then now the return on investment is higher because we have more test automation, more testing, more analysis, more defects are found on different products, et cetera. You should never buy this product or any product only for a select group. It needs to be used by more people in order to benefit from a return on investment.

View full review »
OM
Research & Development Engineer at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

It works as a solution to serve a certain clientele that we cannot serve with other products.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, SeleniumHQ, Tricentis and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user313965 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant with 10,001+ employees

You could cut the technical part of the test automation processes by about 50%.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, SeleniumHQ, Tricentis and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.