UKG Previous Solutions
DA
reviewer2119809
Associate Manager at a educational organization with 201-500 employees
I'm working as a pre-sales lead on Workday's HCM platform. So, my company has three products under an umbrella. So apart from UKG, we also deal with Workday and Cornerstone. I work with all of them simultaneously.
View full review »We previously used Paychex. Their system did not integrate well and caused data nightmares.
View full review »We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
UKG
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about UKG. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We did not have a "real" HRMS solution; we were using Deltek CostPoint which isn't a fully functioning HRMS.
View full review »SG
reviewer1737654
Sr HRIS Analyst at a real estate/law firm with 201-500 employees
We had Oracle for payroll and Taleo was our performance and learning solution. It was mostly on-premise setup, and we had a ginormous team that was offshore. They did all of the maintenance. We were looking for a system that we could manage ourselves. We needed to upgrade or implement a new solution. We decided to do our RFP. We narrowed down our scope of solutions, and we went with UKG. It is more agile.
View full review »SD
reviewer1634187
Senior Manager IT at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
We used Lawson and custom home-built solutions. It was an easy decision to replace our homegrown product, which was difficult to maintain, with an off-the-shelf product.
View full review »The previous solution we were using did not fit with the goals and values that we felt would be necessary for us to grow as an organization. We wanted to align with a company that matched with our beliefs and would allow for us to configure a system that worked for us, not a system that we had to work around.
View full review »We switched from our previous solution due to scalability, lack of reporting, and end-user ease of use and experience.
View full review »We previously used ADP. We switched because they had hidden costs and their reporting system was not user-friendly.
View full review »We did previously used a different solution. The other system was slow and outdated. Customer service was poor.
View full review »We switched because Kronos is the product that can shape shift the most to adhere to company standards.
View full review »We did not use a previous solution.
View full review »We used Oracle HCM & I found it very difficult to work with & very difficult to get responses from support; not user friendly to navigate either.
View full review »We did previously used ADP; cannot compare.
View full review »We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »We previously used a different solution. We switched because of integration with HR, multi-state and scalability, along with the cost.
View full review »We previously used a CBIZ legacy system. We switched because Ultipro was the best solution to help our growth.
View full review »We previously used Oracle, and we switched because we emerged as a new company from our parent company after a split due to bankruptcy.
View full review »BG
Brett Garlick
Director - Human Resource Services at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Yes. I switched because I needed a cloud-based system with richer functionality.
View full review »AA
Alexis Alleyne
HRIS Benefits Manager at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees
We previously used a different solution. We switched because it could not meet our needs as a business and wasn't flexible enough.
View full review »We previously used ADP. We switched because of the lack of flexibility, the mainframe processing, and the constant need to upgrade to new platforms.
View full review »We did previously used ADP.
View full review »We used Dataease. I'm not sure what prompted the transition, but I'm glad it happened.
View full review »We previously used ADP and we switched for pricing and stability issues.
View full review »Our old system was way too limited for what we needed. It was a solution for 100 employees or less and we outgrew it years ago.
View full review »RP
reviewer1176129
Sr. Systems Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
We were using Workday before, and I'm really glad we changed to UKG. Workday is not user-friendly. I don't know if it was the way the company was using it or if it is the way Workday is, but UKG seems way better to me.
View full review »SW
Chief984032
Chief Architect at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees
We previously used ADP. We switched because they forgot about client service.
View full review »Paper system to Dos ult, the other half of the company was on a mainframe system. We merged companies and did an RFI and determined that Ulti was the best solution for us.
View full review »We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »We previously used Oracle.
View full review »We previously used a different solution. We switched because it was not capable of doing the things we needed for our organization.
View full review »We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »We did not have a system prior to the Ultipro implementation.
View full review »We switched from PeopleSoft to UltiPro; greatest decision ever for our small company of only 150 employees.
View full review »We did - we switched because our other system was not customizable at all and we needed to customize our system. We also needed integration with other vendors which in some cases were not an option with our old solution.
View full review »DC
Deanna Criss
Accounting Coordinator at Smithers-Oasis Company
We implemented it less than two years ago, but it is already a better solution than ADP.
View full review »We previously used ADP. We switched because it was an older system and we needed the ability to do more.
View full review »Newer software, multiple HR functions within one package.
View full review »Yes, we were using the HR/Payroll module of our accounting software and it did not fit the needs of HR.
View full review »Yes, we used Ceridian. Ultimate provided more user-friendly processes and reporting.
View full review »Our old system was Total HR, which we owned. It was not scalable, and not very compliant because of the flexibility to do whatever you wanted in the data or system. It resided on an obsolete platform, which was not easily secured or could be accessed remotely.
View full review »We previously used just the manual paper time sheet. We switched to save time, save labor in payroll and increase accuracy.
View full review »There was too much manual entry in the old system, and the HR and payroll systems were different.
View full review »We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »We previously used an older version of ADP.
View full review »We previously used a different solution. We switched because of poor customer service and cost.
View full review »I used InfinityHR at my past job but starting using UltiPro when I switched jobs.
View full review »We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »Yes, Silkroad - it was terrible in every sense.
View full review »We are currently using Kronos Workforce Ready Time Labor Management. We switched from UTM because the reporting feature was HORRIBLE and UTM could not really address our needs and issues.
View full review »Ceridian
View full review »We have been using Ultipro since Y2K.
View full review »We switched to UltiPro for more functionality and financial reasons.
View full review »We used ABRA. It was not employee friendly.
View full review »There was no previous solution.
View full review »We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »At this employer, we did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »Yes, reason for switching was customer service.
View full review »We did not.
View full review »The company did not put people first.
View full review »Yes, ADP. They couldn't provide an interface to our HR System and it took too long to calculate payrolls.
View full review »Oracle, move was because of the complexity of the solution. Needed to have too many DBAs on staff to support the product.
View full review »Yes. Needed one system that was integrated.
View full review »Yes. Paychex.
View full review »We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »The previous provider was not able to handle the growth of the organization.
View full review »We previously used an ADP solution that was not web based. Portal and recruitment were our reasons for switching.
View full review »We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »We previously used ADP Workforce Now.
View full review »I came from Workday....I changed because I changed companies.
View full review »The previous system was not suitable for our needs.
View full review »Yes, we used Workday.
View full review »ADP; their payroll team was not knowledgeable enough!
View full review »We switched from our previous solution because of customer service.
View full review »We used Workday.
View full review »We previously used ADP. We switched because it is better than their system.
View full review »We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »We previously used ADP. We switched because ADP had crappy reports.
View full review »We previously used a different solution. We switched because of pricing.
View full review »We previously used Oracle.
View full review »We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »We previously used a different solution. We switched because it did not have any report writing capabilities.
View full review »We used ADP and the customer service was bad.
View full review »We did not use a previous solution.
View full review »We evaluated Paylocity. We switched due to the implementation
View full review »I previously used a different solution, but this company had Ultimate.
View full review »We previously used ADP. We switched because our parent company switched.
View full review »We previously used a different solution and switched to have both an HR and payroll system that worked together.
View full review »We previously used a different solution. The system was not user-friendly and had a lot of restrictions.
View full review »We previously used a different solution. We switched because the compliance offered by Ultipro is up to par.
View full review »I previously used Lawson. I switched because I changed companies.
View full review »We previously used ADP. We moved to have one single sign-on and ease use of product for users.
View full review »We did not have a previous solution.
View full review »We previously used a different solution. We switched because upper management wanted a different system.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
UKG
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about UKG. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.