$("#con-aspect-container .snippet-list").append('
SQ<\/span><\/div><\/div>
Syed Anas Quadri<\/span><\/a><\/div>
Technical Services Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Jul 31, 2019<\/div><\/div>
The licensing packet is confusing. If Veritas could do a better job of clarifying it, that would be helpful.<\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Read full review<\/a> <\/i><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
SJ<\/span><\/div><\/div>
Suman Jha<\/span><\/a><\/div>
Manager - Backup & DR Global Infrastructure at TMF Group<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/i><\/i><\/i><\/i><\/i> <\/span>
Aug 5, 2020<\/div><\/div>
It could be improved in the area of reporting and ease-of-use.<\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Read full review<\/a> <\/i><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
PA<\/span><\/div><\/div>
Pawel Augustyn<\/span><\/a><\/div>
System Senior Engineer at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/i><\/i><\/i><\/i><\/i> <\/span>
Sep 19, 2022<\/div><\/div>
It is currently missing the dynamic backup feature for virtual machines, which is available in NetWorker. I can create politics in NetWorker to add virtual machines with specific tags, but I cannot do this in Backup Exec, which is a minus point for me. Currently, a user has to send a request to the Backup administrator to add a machine to the backup, but I should be able to create rules to automatically add a new machine to the backup. This kind of functionality is very important in current times, especially when we are using cloud solutions.\n\nI should be able to create more than one stream in a policy and specify how many streams I want to run in parallel in one policy. Currently, I have to manually create more policies to backup more than one virtual machine at the same time.\n\nTheir support can also be improved in terms of response time.<\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Read full review<\/a> <\/i><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
\"Burak<\/div>
Burak Pehlevan<\/span><\/a><\/div>
SaaS Infrastructure Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/i><\/i><\/i><\/i><\/i> <\/span>
Jul 5, 2022<\/div><\/div>
The reports could be made in an easier way.<\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Read full review<\/a> <\/i><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
AD<\/span><\/div><\/div>
Ash Dib<\/span><\/a><\/div>
Virtualization Specialist at Digikala<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/i><\/i><\/i><\/i><\/i> <\/span>
Aug 4, 2019<\/div><\/div>
The user interface needs to be improved.<\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Read full review<\/a> <\/i><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
GC<\/span><\/div><\/div>
Gireesan C<\/span><\/a><\/div>
Senior Manager at Datamatics Global Services Limited<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/i><\/i><\/i><\/i><\/i> <\/span>
Aug 11, 2022<\/div><\/div>
Whenever a job fails, it would be a great improvement to be able to resume the job from that feature. Suppose a job was started this morning and that it is going on while there are interruptions like network issues, server restart issues, server connectivity issues, services stopping, etc. For some reason, let's assume that the job failed or that it was mistakenly canceled by another person. It will be a great improvement if that failed job can be continued.<\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div>
Read full review<\/a> <\/i><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
VV<\/span><\/div><\/div>