Visual Studio Test Professional Pros and Cons

Visual Studio Test Professional Pros

Mohamed Sadek
Lead DevOps and Release Engineer-L2 at ITWORX
We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available.
View full review »
GhamdanAl-Anesi
Member of the Board & Co-Founder, Executive Manager at Networld Systems
Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software.
View full review »
Priscila Elias
SQA Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Micro Focus, Ranorex and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: February 2021.
465,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1478481
Senior Developer at a non-profit with 10,001+ employees
It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us.
View full review »
Vaishali-Aggarwal
Counselor at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools.
View full review »
Istvan Zsikla
Assistance Engineer at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees
The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about.
View full review »
RameshVelusamy
Programmer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects.
View full review »
reviewer1116996
Senior Business Intelligence Consultant at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The setup is easy and straightforward.
View full review »
reviewer1249554
Systems Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper.
View full review »
reviewer1222302
Managing Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Performance-wise, it is a great tool.
View full review »

Visual Studio Test Professional Cons

Mohamed Sadek
Lead DevOps and Release Engineer-L2 at ITWORX
The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user.
View full review »
GhamdanAl-Anesi
Member of the Board & Co-Founder, Executive Manager at Networld Systems
Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement.
View full review »
Priscila Elias
SQA Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Micro Focus, Ranorex and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: February 2021.
465,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1478481
Senior Developer at a non-profit with 10,001+ employees
It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio. In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux.
View full review »
Vaishali-Aggarwal
Counselor at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers.
View full review »
Istvan Zsikla
Assistance Engineer at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees
The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use.
View full review »
RameshVelusamy
Programmer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins.
View full review »
reviewer1116996
Senior Business Intelligence Consultant at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The data flow can be improved.
View full review »
reviewer1249554
Systems Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable.
View full review »
reviewer1222302
Managing Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The pricing of this solution should be lowered.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Micro Focus, Ranorex and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: February 2021.
465,836 professionals have used our research since 2012.