The solution is more expensive than Intune.

All licenses from VMware are only yearly. They start with a yearly license and look for a three-year commitment and yearly PO. So, it's a yearly license only, no monthly options.

It is quite expensive, but I think large companies have agreements with these organizations that provide remote monitoring for phones, and they get massive discounts. The public price does not reflect what they pay. You won't get the same pricing if you're buying for 10 employees versus 1,000 employees. On the public price, you get perhaps a 10% discount, but if you're buying 1,000, the discount could be really massive, especially if you signed a contract for a number of years.

I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

It is neither too expensive nor too cheap. The pricing can be improved. Actually, most of the features are included, but some of them are payable. There are add-ons that require additional payment.

So, most of them are add-ons that we need to pay extra for. I think that was one issue with the product.

Currently, the product is priced at around 50 USD. However, in India, there is a similar product available for around 25 USD.

If you lower the price too much, then the reseller and distributor don't earn money and they won't promote your product because software is a service.

The solution is about $45 per device for a 12 month subscription. The price is standard across the world. 

For the enrollment service, if the project is too big and there are too many devices, sometimes a customer will outsource the enrollment service or the professional service.

We have a three-year contract that we pay on a yearly basis. The pricing is on the website. For big users, it's around $500.

VMware Workspace ONE licensing price is good with their supportability. The price of VMware Workspace ONE is reasonable. We are using an enterprise license.

The tool is expensive. VMware products are always expensive.

I can't speak to the exact pricing and licensing. It's pretty reasonable in terms of the cost. 

It is not an expensive solution. The pricing is good. It's also less expensive than InTune. I'd rate their pricing five out of five.  

It's an expensive tool.

The solution’s pricing is favorable.

I would say that at the very least the pricing needs to be revised. Workspace ONE is on the higher end of the pricing band when compared to other players in the market.

Pricing may need to be subsidized.

The price is reasonable given the features that Workspace ONE provides. 

Not every company or every organization in the world can afford the VMware Workspace ONE just for the features. Some companies might be using some of the features, and they will have to pay for the rest of the features, even if they are not utilizing them.

It's a subscription from VMware. We have a hybrid setup with a physical gateway on site, however, beyond that, it's subscription-based.

We are paying about $145,000 a year on a three-year subscription with no ability to scale up or scale down within that class model.

I was not here when the initial purchase was made, so I don't have that comparative analysis from three years ago. It does not strike me as particularly expensive, however, given that Intune is now included with my E3 subscription, it's on the expensive side now.

Typically, the solution comes as part of a package deal. 

In some cases, a customer may feel the solution is expensive.

The price of VMware Workspace ONE is expensive. However, for the features that are provided, the price is reasonable. There is a subscription to use the solution.

I rate the price of VMware Workspace ONE a seven out of ten.

The price of the solution is costly for the number of users I am using it for.

If you have a host of custom requirements (including licensing), make sure to set aside enough time for the initial setup because it can take up to a few weeks depending on how complex your environment is. 

I rate the pricing a five out of ten.

We paid a yearly license fee for the solution. Our organization has stopped using the solution because it was expensive.

It's a costly solution.

While it is not inexpensive in terms of price, it is definitely worth it. In terms of pricing and the functionality we get with the MDM, I believe it is more than adequate.

We have a three-year subscription.

The solution runs at roughly around $36/user for a year. Companies just pay the basic fee. That's MSRP. They do sales off of that so that vendors can get discounts under certain circumstances. The price will vary, however, that's the MSRP on it.

I've seen them go crazy at the company's year-end. Timing really can be everything.

The solution can be costly when the customer is dealing with multiple platforms. If a customer is only dealing with iOS, Windows, and Android then Intune is the better choice because there are free licenses.

Depending on the requirements of users, there is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product.

The pricing currently is higher than the competition.

For most of the projects, we use the standard license but for complex ones, we use the older type of processes, integrations, and licenses inside the solution.

I have no opinion about the pricing. 

In terms of pricing, this solution is definitely much more expensive compared to other solutions, like MobileIron or MaaS360 or any other product in the market. This solution is more expensive by 30 or 40 percent. That is very hard because, while enterprise companies can afford for this pricing, if you look at the SMB sector, they can't afford this pricing, and they won't adopt this kind of technology.

There was a commercial team that dealt with that. My guess is that its licensing was yearly. There was probably no fee in addition to the standard licensing fee.

Licensing costs are similar to other products and I believe the cost is reasonable. 

VMware Workspace ONE has a yearly license. You pay upfront for one year. You have to buy licenses for one year at a time.

Our customers are concerned about the costs. The solution is higher than they want it to be. There are additional fees beyond the licensing fees. You need to have additional resources, like servers and more storage. This can become very expensive.

It's definitely a bit on the expensive side. It is more for smaller organizations and not large, massive enterprises.

I am not sure about any additional costs. As far as we could tell, the billing was what the billing was.

There is a licensing fee for the users, and we pay a low amount for our support costs. We hire a consultancy for support but it is not very expensive.

I don't have a view on pricing.

AirWatch would benefit from reducing the license pricing per user per month. Microsoft bundles everything, and then that bundling makes the product free for the customers.

VMware Workspace ONE is expensive.

VMware is expensive and continues to raise licensing costs year on year. Business model is to separate services so you need more servers which if you are a VMWare customer cost you more in licensing costs.

Also, I've noticed that the minimum hardware specs for your servers continue to be raised.

VMware Workspace ONE can fit any organization because if you need more devices there are only additional fees.

The price of VMware Workspace ONE is reasonable.

For the moment, we have a multi-year contract, meaning that we cannot go with a different solution at this time even if the price should prove more favorable. Only next year can we evaluate the price. 

I don't deal with the licensing myself but we've got 1,500 devices so you can get an idea of what the cost is going to be. We have 500 users in the company. 

If you purchase it for one year, it is very expensive. If you get it for three years or up to five years, then you can bargain a better price.

We have a multi-year contract, however, we'd like the costs to be lowered if possible. Next year we plan to revisit everything and do a price evaluation.

VMware Workspace ONE is not cheap; it's quite expensive. However, in the end, they gave us a reasonable price.

Don't make compromises when enticed by enterprise license agreements for other products that may include their own MDM for a substantially low price.

You should take out a dedicated license agreement of your MDM fleet and invest heavily in innovating in this space. I've seen many companies that buy into MDM and don't make a continued investment in evolving their use cases.

The license is paid annually.

Decent pricing. Device based licensing is the best approach.

Its pricing was okay for our company.

I don't handle licensing or billing. Therefore, I'm not sure what the total cost is to our organization. I don't know if it's overly expensive or fairly reasonable. I'm purely a technical team member.

There is a separate cost for technical support and extra premium features. The pricing should be simplified.

Some users think that the cloud model will lower the cost but that is not necessarily the case. 

Pricing is the correct price, it's normal pricing. I think that the price is reasonable.

The cost is a little bit high.

The pricing of the product needs advisement. It would be great to bundle the VM products together. The actual box itself should be included in the license. At present, it is not paired with the mobile device. Furthermore, the Licensing Structure of the VMware products is expensive if purchased separately.

The pricing and licensing are affordable. They are not too high.

Pricing is an area that could be improved. 

They are much better than Microsoft but it is difficult to compete against them.

Microsoft has everything embedded and VMware is a different product.