Cost-saving benefits from the use of the product are possible in the area of hardware costs. My company only has to incur some zero client costs. My company also doesn't have to buy dedicated workstations for similar applications, as we can deploy virtual machines to run our applications. My company just buys zero clients at a very nominal cost and connects them to the terminal servers.

We have seen a return on investments.

VMware has tools to calculate projected ROI. The customers don't hit that projection, but they get relatively close. Typically the projected return is higher than what customers actually see.

In my personal opinion, the solution is worth the investment and provides good value for its cost.

There is a good ROI.

We definitely have an ROI. Previously, we had to patch every single laptop which was a drastic pain. With everybody now working from home, that created a whole bunch of new challenges but with VMware everything's saved in our network so no matter what's happening on the home network it's not carrying over into our business.

We have seen a return on investment with VMware Horizon View.

We have seen ROI between two and three years.

Choosing VDI to save hardware costs is not the goal of Horizon, because the infrastructure and licensing break-even point can only be reached after the 1000^th VDI. ROI must be measured in controlling the manpower costs. For this reason, often it is difficult to show the real advantage of the Horizon solution. In my case, because I'm using it for demo purposes I can't give more details about this.

It is very high, we are planning to introduce to all of our class rooms.