webMethods Integration Server Alternatives and Competitors

Get our free report covering MuleSoft, Oracle, IBM, and other competitors of webMethods Integration Server. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Read reviews of webMethods Integration Server alternatives and competitors

JustinJames
IT Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
Jun 19, 2019
Easy to implement and supports platforms like Windows, Linux, and Mac

What is our primary use case?

I'm a consultant in a bank in Kuwait. I suggest good products for companies that are seeking my advice.

Pros and Cons

  • "The most valuable feature of Mule ESB is data transformation, i.e. our interacting with different systems and orchestrating for our business needs."
  • "Mule ESB is more into the latest REST APIs, not much into the SOAP web services. Developing is all about web services and not easy with Mule."

What other advice do I have?

My opinion is that Mule ESB depends on the business and the continuity of their enrollment. If you are a system that has not much left to repair, then your products and your APIs are assets within your organization. Here in the bank, we are facing different kinds of issues when we are integrating different systems: * We are communicating with different card carriers like Mastercard and Visa. * Their standards are different according to the client requirements, i.e. exactly what kind of card they're looking for. * They can get the products according to their requirements as well as their…
reviewer703206
Enterprise Solution Architect at a transportation company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Sep 27, 2019
Good performance, high-availability features, and provides an easy way to develop integrations

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use for this solution is to integrate different applications into the aviation area. We have an on-premises deployment.

Pros and Cons

  • "From a performance point of view, it's very good and it doesn't need very much in terms of CPU resources."
  • "This product uses the PVU (Processor Value Unit) license model from IBM, and it is something that should be improved."

What other advice do I have?

My advice for anybody implementing this solution for the first time is to have people from IBM on-site to help you establish the operating procedures and the development procedures. My understanding is that the new release will have a lot of new features, including support for Docker containers. At this point, I don't have any requirements for the new release. It has also been rebranded. This is a good solution from a technical and operational point of view, but they should really remove this technically complicated license controlling. It is very complicated software that you have to install…
Hamza BAMMOU
Lead Tech of Oracle Service Bus with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 10
Feb 27, 2020
Good connectors for interfacing with other applications, but the technical support needs to be improved

What is our primary use case?

We are using Oracle Service Bus to connect between API management and microservices. For example, we use it for data transformation, bringing data from a specific form in one service to another form in a different service.

Pros and Cons

  • "The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can connect with different applications."
  • "This solution should work better with RESTful services."

What other advice do I have?

My advice to anybody who is implementing this solution is to study the architecture that they want to implement very well. That way, they won't have to have repeated flows that do the same work. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Get our free report covering MuleSoft, Oracle, IBM, and other competitors of webMethods Integration Server. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.