webMethods Integration Server Pros and Cons

webMethods Integration Server Pros

Ivan Herlambang
Integration Engineer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine).
View full review »
Hassan Hussien
Consultant at AXA
We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting.
View full review »
SrSoftwaDev
Sr. Software Developer | Systems Integration Specialist | Project Manager | EDI Technical Lead at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Software AG, MuleSoft, IBM and others in ESB. Updated: March 2020.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Promanit677
IT Project Manager at a maritime company with 10,001+ employees
A product with good API and EDI components.
View full review »
Mayank Tripathi
Senior Associate at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)
View full review »
Kishore Kuchana
Lead Solutions Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging.
View full review »

webMethods Integration Server Cons

Ivan Herlambang
Integration Engineer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData.
View full review »
Hassan Hussien
Consultant at AXA
We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics.
View full review »
SrSoftwaDev
Sr. Software Developer | Systems Integration Specialist | Project Manager | EDI Technical Lead at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Software AG, MuleSoft, IBM and others in ESB. Updated: March 2020.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Promanit677
IT Project Manager at a maritime company with 10,001+ employees
The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly.
View full review »
Mayank Tripathi
Senior Associate at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Software AG, MuleSoft, IBM and others in ESB. Updated: March 2020.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.