We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

webMethods.io Integration Alternatives and Competitors

Get our free report covering Software AG, Microsoft, Boomi, and other competitors of webMethods.io Integration. Updated: October 2021.
541,708 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Read reviews of webMethods.io Integration alternatives and competitors

KS
Integration Solution & Platform Specialist at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Highly scalable, simple to install, and reasonably priced

Pros and Cons

  • "Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
  • "They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."

What is most valuable?

Low-code development is the most valuable feature.

What needs improvement?

They have progressed from an ESP architecture, but they have not fully embraced all API design first methodologies. As a result, some features in those areas, such as API management, API gateway, API development, and API dashboards, are missing, but they are still a new product.

Better documentation and more know-how knowledge would be appreciated. When it comes to technical support and designing, they don't have that growth rate.

They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Boomi AtomSphere Integration for approximately four years.

With the iPaaS integration, we are always using the latest version.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a stable product.

We experience a few issues but managed to get them stabilized.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The Boomi AtomSphere Integration is highly scalable.

We have 10 to 15 developers who use this solution, and it is used in over 200 applications.

We have plans to expand in the future.

How are customer service and support?

I believe they still have a long way to go before they can compete with the other products. They're quite helpful in support, but because the product releases so many bug fixes or port releases each month, some of them don't get tested or have issues, and the support team isn't aware of it. So we have to be very involved with them, but they are working hard to improve.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I've used.NET Web Services, Webmethods, and MuleSoft. 

They have some advantages and disadvantages, but Boomi AtomSphere Integration stands out and outperforms the other products in terms of licensing and scalability.

From a licensing perspective, especially if you are on-premises, and then the cloud. 

From a feature perspective obviously, MuleSoft and others have a bigger issue.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was easy.

It took a couple of hours to install.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do. It's one of the reasons you're able to grow.

What other advice do I have?

Before you choose a product, understand your integration and API design requirements, as well as the feature capabilities that are required.

I would rate Boomi AtomSphere Integration an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
Get our free report covering Software AG, Microsoft, Boomi, and other competitors of webMethods.io Integration. Updated: October 2021.
541,708 professionals have used our research since 2012.