webMethods.io Integration Room for Improvement

Berniem Elfrink - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Architect at DXC Technology

The main reason my company decided to replace webMethods.io Integration is because of the integration capabilities in the newer versions of the tool. Whenever there is a new version of webMethods.io Integrations, there is a lot of work to be done by our company since the newer versions don't offer seamless integration. The aforementioned reason can be considered for improvement in webMethods.io Integrations.

With the solution, our company has experienced sudden outages at times. The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required.

Not just the cost related to licensing but also the cost of introducing new versions need improvement in the product. When you have an OS like Windows or Apple, in which some new features are installed when you restart your system, after which everything works fine, with webMethods.io Integration, the new features introduced in the tool don't just need you to stop and restart your application but expects you to update the whole application to be able to use the new functionalities, which is something that is good. My company does a business in which we have to create a complete project which costs a lot of money. In the future, I expect to not be paying a lot of money or extra work to be able to update the product, and webMethods.io Integration needs to update the product automatically.

View full review »
Joao Caseiro - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at Novabase

The solution's release management and JSON services need improvement.

View full review »
ME
Sr.Presales & Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Any solution needs continuous development in integration and processing.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Software AG, SAP, Microsoft and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
HM
Programm Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols. While I know that they have the new versions, which are actually needed, I don't believe they have that capacity when it comes to any integration with older systems. This is because I believe us to be more advanced nowadays, with what they are doing for the roadmap of new technologies.

View full review »
HM
IT Solution & Application Director at Delta Samudra Abadi

webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors. 

View full review »
Berniem Elfrink - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Architect at DXC Technology

I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier. There's a lot of rework that needs to be done if you go to a newer version.

View full review »
Joao Caseiro - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at Novabase

I think rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved. I think they must accommodate the future of the communication between systems and that is related to web services and the like. 

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Software AG, SAP, Microsoft and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.