Wikidi Testomato Competitors and Alternatives

The top Wikidi Testomato competitors are
    Read reviews of Wikidi Testomato competitors and alternatives
    Continuous Delivery Lead at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Aug 23 2016

    What do you think of Tricentis Tosca?

    Overall, it is quite a different experience in using it. It does not contain any code, and builds from the requirements as a model of what the actual application will contain. The catch being that initially you do not need to define your test cases from the application end and things might not even be in sequence of what the actual final application would look like. I have an analogy for this – a human body is composed of head, body, hands and legs. Each one has its own “attributes”, which in turn have “instances”. This is what is called the ‘Model-based approach’. Each hand will have attributes such as fingers, nails, elbow, fore-hand, wrist, etc. Then, all these attributes will have instances – long fingers, short fingers, thick fingers, etc. Now to build a body, you need to...
    Real User
    Test Automation Lead/Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Jan 02 2018

    What do you think of Selenium HQ?

    Primary Use Case We took Selenium for web product test automation and as it very well suits as it has capacity to execute in different browser, different environment. Also it has lot other capacities to scale up test automation and yield better ROI. • Improvements to My Organization Web-based application automation are mostly done using Selenium. It's the right automation tool as a replacement for manual regression testing that indispensably reduces the testing time due to its cross-browser, parallel, and remote executions. • Valuable Features - Most importantly, it is an open source tool. - Parallel executions (same browser in parallel, different browser in parallel). - Remote executions using Node and Hub. - Integration with CI tools like Jenkins - Multi-platform...
    Sauce Labs
    Real User
    Intern - Technology Development Program at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Dec 11 2016

    What is most valuable?

    It's ability to test on multiple browsers and OS combinations is invaluable as a QA tool. However, it's CI integration with Jenkins is why we were able to make a case to include this product in our ATDD process.

    How has it helped my organization?

    This has helped greatly as our organization switches from a waterfall method to an Agile method of software development. The transition is difficult and hectic at times, as it requires a big change in the way we think about, and treat the... more»

    What needs improvement?

    Rarely, some tests fail, seemingly without cause, and will succeed again the next time we run the tests. This isn't a behavior we saw when testing locally.
    Micro Focus
    QA Automation Engineer at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
    May 14 2018

    What do you think of UFT (QTP)?

    In my ten years of hands-on combined experience using QTP (QuickTest Professional), for at least 8 years, and UFT (Unified Functional Testing), for at least 2 years, I have observed that there has been a lot of confusion among the testing community on what the difference is between the two tools. Therefore, I thought it would be beneficial to clarify what distinguishes UFT from QTP because it is important for the reader to know. QTP is a functional and regression automation tool originally developed and marketed by Mercury Interactive which HP acquired in 2006. In 2012, HP released UFT (Unified Functional Testing) version 11.5, which combined QuickTest Professional and HP Service Test into a single software package along with newly designed IDE (Integrated Development...
    SmartBear Software
    Real User
    QA Automation Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
    Aug 24 2017

    What is most valuable?

    It's cross platform automation capabilities specially ranging across web, UNIX (via putty), and other systems.

    How has it helped my organization?

    TestComplete replaced QTP as the preferred choice of tool for the organization. It is much faster, works better across technologies (esp. Flex based UI) and is better compatible with newer technologies directly out of the box. We could have... more»

    What needs improvement?

    The code editor, though following eclipse-style, is still a work in progress and gives a very poorly formatted code once viewed via other editing tools like Notepad++. Performance is another aspect which can be improved.
    Real User
    Senior Programmer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
    Jan 29 2017

    What do you think of Zeenyx AscentialTest?

    Valuable Features Our web site is dynamically generated to each user, so much so that the only testing solution we found was AscentialTest. The unique ability to take a snapshot of a form, have controls on that page dynamically recognized, combined with being able to store all our form variables in a SQL database helped us automate repeatable testing. • Improvements to My Organization Automated repeatable tests that can be compared to a control, help find and keep bugs from being released into our live system. • Room for Improvement I would like to see a debugger added. • Use of Solution I have used it for two years. • Deployment Issues We have not encountered any deployment issues. • Stability Issues We have not encountered any stability issues. •...

    Sign Up with Email