Choose a specific buying criteria from the list and see what real users have to say about it.

Zeenyx AscentialTest Previous Solutions

Anonymous avatar x60
Systems Manager at a renewables & environment company with 1,001-5,000 employees
No. view full review »
SilkTest It stopped supporting PowerBuilder applications view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Software Engineering Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
In fact we couldnt use another solution previously as we were working on an old version of Siebel that was not been supported by many solutions out there in the market. view full review »
8100d47f 5bcd 4b65 8225 34c8dbb94562 avatar?1436205274
Principal Quality Management Analyst at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Before Zeenyx AscentialTest, our company was using an old version of SilkTest (that was out of maintenance). The main reason for the switch was that we wanted to have support but were unwilling to continue the maintenance with the previous software. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Senior Test Engineer at The American Hospital Association
My company had an outside vendor as well as one of our employees try to complete an automated solution using Selenium ( https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/selenium-hq ). A framework was created but the automation was never completed. In 2015, after my company went through several failed attempts at automating one of the key applications at my company, my boss and I decided I would give it a try. We were somewhat invested in Selenium and I had past experience with QTP ( https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/hpe-uft-qtp ), but I hadn't done any coding since 2003 and really didn't want to script. I decided to do a formal tool evaluation. I evaluated tools, services, and scripting languages. See list below. Note AscentialTest is not on the list. We selected SmartBear's TestComplete ( https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/smartbear-testcomplete ). Appvance ( https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/appvance ) AutoMate ( https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/automate ) Fluent Lenium HP Tools (QTP) IBM Tools (Rational) ( https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/ibm-rational-quality-manager ) qTest eXplorer ( https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/qtest ) *** Not an automation tool. Captures manual test steps. Pyramid Consulting *** Not an automation tool. Service vendor. Ranorex ( https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/ranorex ) Reslet Selenium SmartScript TestComplete TestingAnywhere TestQuest ZAPTEST ( https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/zaptest ) TestComplete was very affordable and it was very easy to capture user work flows with TestComplete. But once I tried to capture and playback some of the unique aspects of our applications, was when I ran into problems. I spent 6 months working with technical support to resolve each hurdle. At the end they agreed there were too many manual interventions (a.k.a. hacks). They said they had never seen anything like it. Fast forward to the 2016 QUEST Conference and Expo. I stopped by the Zeenyx ( https://www.itcentralstation.com/vendors/zeenyx ) booth and met with Brian Le Suer. He gave me an overview and demo of AscentialTest. I was really impressed and excited about the tool and sorry I didn't know about the tool the year before. I started working with a trial version right after the conference. It's been really easy to automate the same applications TestComplete struggled with. I have been able to automate two of our key applications in just a few months. I haven't even taken their training yet. My boss is also happy with AscentialTest and he's only seen two things I've automated. view full review »
E9c3cbdb 6665 416c ab59 eae3524d2fe9 avatar
Managing Director at MatryxSoft Tech
Prior to AscentialTest, one of our team did regression testing of these 2300 test cases scripted in Silk Test classic agent. Some custom windows were unrecognized with lack of support on classic agent. It was cumbersome, as not all the tests were in good shape for execution. Most of the tests were partially executed by automation and partially by manual; very time consuming. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
IT Supervisor at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Prior to AscentialTest we did only manual testing, with over 1500 scripted tests. Manual testing was problematic because it diverted people away from other urgent tasks. With automated tests we can run tests as needed instead of when we can schedule it. view full review »

Sign Up with Email