Zenoss Service Dynamics Room for Improvement

Kalin Hadzhivelikov
Consulting Cloud Architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Zenoss Service Dynamics is good at the moment. I don't see anything that needs to be improved. In terms of monitoring, they need some sort of customization options. It should be more intuitive. Zenoss Service Dynamics is quite complex, i.e. the number of required corrections, etc. There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring. Either this was because of some specifics of the storage hardware or some specifics of the Zenoss software. Zenoss has virtually excluded storage integration from their support. Zenoss has built in a number of add-ons, some of them unique to their needs and some that can be customized for a particular product. Zenoss sometimes can be too complex. View full review »
FayçAl Noushi
CEO/Founder at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
I would like to see greater importance placed on the open-source version of this solution. This solution is complex for beginners so it takes some time to learn. The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Zenoss, Azul Systems, Microsoft and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: January 2020.
391,122 professionals have used our research since 2012.