2016-08-23 11:13:00 UTC

SAP GUI Testing Tool


For SAP GUI automation, can anyone share limitations of HP UFT, Ranorex, TestComplete, SAP TAO?

Guest
88 Answers

author avatar
Vendor

Thanks all, it's encouraging to see so much support and responses

2016-08-24 04:25:20 UTC
author avatar
Vendor

All of these solutions are based on scripts and face the associated limitations. Test data management, parameterization, dynamic TBOMs, BPCA, SolMan integration and script maintenance all pose potential issues. I'd recommend looking at Tricentis Tosca or Worksoft, both of which provide scriptless automation for SAP GUI. Tosca also supports Fiori and NWBC natively as well as over 30 different UI and API technologies.
[FULL DISCLOSURE: I work for Tricentis, so obviously biased, but we serve many SAP clients]

2016-08-23 11:59:11 UTC
author avatar
Consultant

Have used HPE UFT and SAP TAO for testing SAP applications. SAP TAO is more oriented towards the use of SAP by the Technical Users, while you can structure your tests in HPE UFT to be more business oriented and UX-driven. The limitations for these tools are as have been iterated above the use of the Scripting Language and more times the use of 'Record and Play' methods to automate the tests.

As mentioned above integration with HP ALM (and BPT) makes the whole process easier to comprehend and work on from a Business viewpoint, and when your end users are basically Business users with limited Technical use. That said, you can try the latest SAP testing with the TOSCA tool also, which now provides the majority of the SAP 'modules' (aka objects) out of the box. This is a scriptless tool and with v9.x has the ability to do record and play and actual 'Exploratory' testing wherein the user can just switch it ON and record and later these steps are translated back into Test Case steps (much like TAO).

TestComplete is also good, but you need C# knowledge for most of the scripting work, otherwise it is a cheaper option to any of the other tools available. Again, you need to be mindful that someone needs to create the initial framework and then users can work on it. This tool is more helpful when doing some Unit Tests.

I am not sure of Ranorex, as have not used it.

2016-08-24 05:04:00 UTC
author avatar
Vendor

It's been a while since I have used SmartBear, but I do know with HP & Ranorex that you will need to have more a development background for both your test logic and object recognition. If your testers are more developers, then you'll be ok. Will be happy to share other options to look at.

2016-08-23 14:03:48 UTC
author avatar
Vendor

Hi Ariel,

I am not aware of any current limitations, other than they were at one point (this may have changed) only able to be scripted with a coding expert, not a Keyword Driven Framework in both UFT and SAP TAO. Ranorex offers support and TestComplete for Oracle forms, web and desktop versions.

Thanks,

Gerry

2016-08-23 12:28:58 UTC
author avatar
Vendor

Hi,

I tested SAP with HPE UFT including BPT with a high level of success. The major difference between TAO and UFT is that UFT approaches testing from a user/business perspective while TAO is more oriented towards technical part by accessing individually each transaction. We were in System and later Acceptance Test so UFT was the tool of choice. HPE UFT detected objects ok, we could access all transactions and compose whatever scenarios crossed our minds. In order to do that we integrated with HP ALM who offered BPT which made the work a lot easier. We knew the tool so no training was necessary but the cost of licenses was quiet high.

Hope it helps
Victor

2016-08-23 12:24:17 UTC
author avatar
Vendor

UFT will support or Tricentis TOSCA .

2016-08-23 12:03:17 UTC
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: May 2020.
419,536 professionals have used our research since 2012.