If you were talking to someone whose organization is considering Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade, what would you say?
How would you rate it and why? Any other tips or advice?
Unfortunately, the product has not proved up to par. Every component has to do its job; it is an excellent advanced firewall solution and we cannot expect it to do everything but the Spam and Email Blade must do its job well as Check Point does.
This solution should be designed to support all functionality, including use as an email gateway in case the functionality is required, as well as having a strong anti-spam module
My advice to anybody who is considering this solution is that it is a robust and reliable platform. With respect to messaging and firewall products, all of them are pretty good but it depends on your scenario. I would say that Check Point has the best security, the messaging protocols are pretty good, and the reliability is higher than competing products by Palo Alto and Juniper. When adopting Check Point, your skill is one of the key points to consider. This is a good solution but there are certain complexities that need to be made more user-friendly. It should be more manageable from an IT perspective. This includes things such as setting up specific policies. A more intuitive GUI, for example, would help. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
We all know it's really hard to get good pricing and cost information.
Please share what you can so you can help your peers.
What is the best email encryption software for small enterprises using Office 365?
It needs to:
Thanks! I appreciate the help.