If you were talking to someone whose organization is considering IBM Rational Quality Manager, what would you say?
How would you rate it and why? Any other tips or advice?
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Consider the introduction of the tool in terms of the proper education of the teams who will adapt it. I think any introduction of such a tool requires proper training. It's not so intuitive that people can trust it. If you just give it to people directly, without any training, then they can get it wrong. Make sure to invest in training Smooth integration with JIRA, but I think this is not realistic. The IBM suite is kind of independent and it's getting more niche because it's not such a big community of users. I would rate it a seven out of ten.
The main competitor of IBM's test management tool is Quality Center. I feel they may have a more user-friendly interface. However, IBM offers a very good management tool and it's integrated well with the different tracking and design testing solutions. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. From a reliability and scalability perspective, it's a good tool. It's well-structured. If they did some upgrades to the interface, it would be just about perfect and I'd rate it closer to nine or nine and a half.
I'm working for a company with 1000+ employees and I'm exploring two products: Panaya and Tricentis.
How good is Panaya Test Dynamix in comparison with Tricentis?