We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Workload Automation?


If you were talking to someone whose organization is considering IBM Workload Automation, what would you say?

How would you rate it and why? Any other tips or advice?

ITCS user
44 Answers

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

I would rate IBM Workload Automation a seven out of ten.

author avatar
Real User

I would definitely recommend this product. It's an interesting option in terms of schedulers. I would rate it an eight out of ten.

author avatar
Real User

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

author avatar
Top 20Real User

The advice I would give to others considering using Workload Automation depends on the necessity and the reality of their requirements. It depends on the complexity of the jobs. Depending on that it may be interesting to use Tivoli because it is a good tool. It is a good application to use to run workload tracking. On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate this product between and eight and ten depending on who is using it and for what reason. I think it is quite good so I think it deserves a nine. Additional features I would like to see included in the next release to improve and make it a ten would just be the two things I mentioned that Control-M does somewhat better for now. The interface for the operator should be improved, and the way to create relationships and dependency between the jobs can be better.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, BMC, Broadcom and others in Workload Automation. Updated: October 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.