If you decide to use this product begin with a small use case and then expand. Think about how you will connect your requirement management process to other engineering processes. It's very important to have a clear scope for Jama and also a clear idea of what is not in Jama. I rate this solution eight out of 10.
Senior Program Manager Software at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
2022-05-13T21:11:03Z
May 13, 2022
Jama is definitely an eight, in my opinion. It depends on how you define your scale, but on a scale of one to ten, where ten is fantastic and zero is terrible, I'd say it's an eight. I would rate Jama Connect an eight out of ten.
Sr. Manager - Systems Engineering - Operations at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-09-28T19:56:07Z
Sep 28, 2021
In my opinion, Jama is an excellent tool when it's used the way it was intended to be used. But our organization is stretching the tool to do things it was not necessarily ever designed to do. Most of the pain points that we run into are due to the fact that we are stretching the envelope of what the tool can do. In summary, this is a good product but everything has room for improvement. I would rate Jama Connect an eight out of ten.
Jama Connect is pretty standard in terms of requirement management. I cannot say that they are any features that stand out. At this point, I cannot say whether or not I would recommend this product because I do not know the pricing. If the price is good then I would recommend it but I just don't know yet. I would rate this solution a five out of ten.
We use the cloud deployment model. I've found the Jama is pretty much top of line nowadays. I'm certified IBM DOORS consultant as well and compared to that, DOORS may have more functionalities but it's also far more complex. The functionality of Jama is much easier. I would rate the solution nine out of ten.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) is a systematic approach to managing the development and delivery of software applications. It encompasses all aspects of the software development process, from requirements gathering to deployment and maintenance.
I would give Jama Connect a rating of seven out of ten.
If you decide to use this product begin with a small use case and then expand. Think about how you will connect your requirement management process to other engineering processes. It's very important to have a clear scope for Jama and also a clear idea of what is not in Jama. I rate this solution eight out of 10.
Jama is definitely an eight, in my opinion. It depends on how you define your scale, but on a scale of one to ten, where ten is fantastic and zero is terrible, I'd say it's an eight. I would rate Jama Connect an eight out of ten.
In my opinion, Jama is an excellent tool when it's used the way it was intended to be used. But our organization is stretching the tool to do things it was not necessarily ever designed to do. Most of the pain points that we run into are due to the fact that we are stretching the envelope of what the tool can do. In summary, this is a good product but everything has room for improvement. I would rate Jama Connect an eight out of ten.
Jama Connect is pretty standard in terms of requirement management. I cannot say that they are any features that stand out. At this point, I cannot say whether or not I would recommend this product because I do not know the pricing. If the price is good then I would recommend it but I just don't know yet. I would rate this solution a five out of ten.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
We use the cloud deployment model. I've found the Jama is pretty much top of line nowadays. I'm certified IBM DOORS consultant as well and compared to that, DOORS may have more functionalities but it's also far more complex. The functionality of Jama is much easier. I would rate the solution nine out of ten.