If you were talking to someone whose organization is considering Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope, what would you say?
How would you rate it and why? Any other tips or advice?
We work on multiple models such as on-premises, and multiple deployments for our customers. More insight that could be shared would be very helpful. We have a great partnership with Micro Focus. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
People should know that if they only use SiteScope, it won't be enough. They will need to get support from other tools. For example, without HM tools, without network manager tools, it will not work. They won't get the old alerts from their environment and they will be unhappy. SiteScope alone is not enough. I would rate this product a seven out of 10.
My advice to other people considering SiteScope as a solution in this category of tools is that I think SiteScope is a good product. It is definitely useful and provides a lot of value. I do not have any other advice in terms of being an end-user because all those things are not a perspective I have on the product. In general, I would recommend SiteScope. On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate SiteScope as an eight-out-of-ten.
I would recommend the product. I would suggest that those considering implementation of the solution need to study their environment first. You need to know what you're going to do before installing SiteScope. Everything needs to be prepared. Communication metrics should be ready. If your communication metrics are not ready, then SiteScope will not work with you. Once you do, however, it will be a piece of cake. Just install it and install the mutation. I would rate the solution nine out of ten.
What do you like most about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
Thanks for sharing your thoughts with the community!