If you were talking to someone whose organization is considering Nutanix AHV, what would you say?
How would you rate it and why? Any other tips or advice?
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
We are comparing to the traditional system that had many problems. I think that all of these problems have been resolved with Nutanix AHV. At this time, as I have only been using it for three months, I am not able to say that there is room for improvement, especially since I am judging and basing it on a comparison with the old system. It has addressed all of the issues we were facing. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
We use many solutions with Nutanix. We use Nutanix AHV, Nutanix CVM, Nutanix Calm, and more. For normal users, they need a web interface, but for users who are more experienced this solution is the best. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
We have many customers using AHV. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it a nine because it needs a web interface.
There are rumors around the globe that suggest Nutanix cannot be used for heavy software. However, I have tested it on all levels and it performs well. I have used it for big data and it works great. The biggest lesson that I have learned when using this solution is related to the sizing of the system. If you define your requirements accurately then you will not see any issues in terms of performance. This means that it is very important to know what you want and what kind of applications will be hosted on Nutanix. You should also understand the use case for Nutanix, itself. When you understand all of this, it prepares you very well for calculating the resources that will be needed. For me, this is the number one hyper-converged solution. I am a fan of VMware, but I can see that in Nutanix, the internal components combine very harmoniously. There is a huge development team behind Nutanix and they are working daily to develop the product and come out with new technologies. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
On a scale from 1 to 10 I would rate it a 9 - I believe there is always room for improvement.
It's a great product. It's relatively easy to use and it works well. Everyone that's moved their machines onto that platform says they are amazed by the performance. It works very well. Performance is good, management of the systems is pretty easy, upgrading and all that stuff is seamless. It's a great platform and I would recommend it to anyone. I would rate it a nine out of ten.
We're using the on-premises deployment model. We're a reseller of the solution. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
This is the number one hyper-converged solution in the market. No doubt about it. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.