The advice would be that you should have automation testers or allow experts to start with an idea of the tool. After that initial learning curve, it would become much easier, like a piece of cake. Proper training is essential for success. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Principal Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
2023-06-19T10:18:00Z
Jun 19, 2023
The solution is easy to learn. I advise others to understand their business requirements before making the purchase decision. They can also opt for tools like Katalon. I rate the solution a seven out of ten because of the complexity of C-Sharp language. They should include Python language instead.
Ranorex Studio does not require any maintenance but our software does. My advice to others implementing this solution is for them to take it slowly, make sure to get everything right in the beginning, and then everything should be running smoothly. I rate Ranorex Studio an eight out of ten.
Senior Consultant at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Consultant
Top 20
2022-10-04T14:01:23Z
Oct 4, 2022
The solution has good quality and functionality but I would not recommend it because of its unfamiliarity in the market. I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Director Of Quality Assurance at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-10-27T23:43:18Z
Oct 27, 2021
I'd rate Ranorex Studio eight out of 10. It works well for us. We can quickly add service agents wherever we need to so we can run multiple scripts in parallel. It runs pretty strongly. As I said, it just doesn't have all the bells and whistles of a UFT, but then again, it's a fraction of the cost. I have some advice for people thinking about using Ranorex. If they're looking at using multiple users, they should consider having their codebase in Bitbucket or something other than Ranorex's proprietary solution. When we first stood this up, they didn't have a feed. They didn't have APIs in Bitbucket or anything else. But now that they do, we would probably be looking to migrate all of our code to Bitbucket or some other repository, so our IT system backs everything up. The options are that or Ranorex's cloud-based solution. The main advantage of Bitbucket is security. So, if your system goes down, you have copies of the system backed up somewhere else. All of our codebase across the organization is managed through Bitbucket and also backed up securely. So we have all our security protocols in place for there. Ranorex's repository plays well with other platforms so that we could use those scripts somewhere else. The only other way to do it is by running them, recording them off something else, and then going back in and re-coding where we need to code to make it work. It's not real friendly to work with multiple teams if you do a single instance setup. So, if you were an organization looking at multiple users, I would recommend looking at the right solution on how numerous teams could use the coding of it and the run-time elements of Ranorex.
Communications Infrastructure, QA Leader at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2020-07-05T09:38:09Z
Jul 5, 2020
My advice for anybody who is considering Ranorex is that it is a powerful tool, it is far-reaching, and it works as advertised. In my opinion, it is one of the best tools available in the market. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Having a local reseller who already knows the product and can provide in-house training would be a fantastic solution and would make the learning curve a quicker process. The transfer of knowledge from one person to another. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Automation Tester at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2019-08-19T05:47:00Z
Aug 19, 2019
We are using the on-premises deployment model. I would recommend people try the solution. They have a 30-day free trial that an organization could use to test them out. Make sure to watch the webinar before implementing the solution, even if they are experimenting with automating. It will make everything easy to understand. Ranorex has a lot of options which you need to understand and to optimize. You can't automate the optimization, which is why the webinar is so important. I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
Test Expert/Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Consultant
2019-08-01T05:43:00Z
Aug 1, 2019
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the product as an eight for what it does for us. For those people in the market looking for an application testing solution, I would recommend evaluating the product and the type of projects you will need it for. I would recommend making an evaluation and comparison with other products to be sure that the needs for testing can be covered in the functionality of the Ranorex. The Ranorex is a studio, of course, so you will have lots of options to apply in ongoing test management and test automation. In my experience, those issues are all covered in Ranorex.
I would rate this solution an eight out of 10 because of the expense of licenses and lack of simultaneous execution. It's limited to only one machine or computer. My advice is to compare solutions. Two years ago there were very different options in the market. Compare Katalon Studios with Ranorex.
Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.
The advice would be that you should have automation testers or allow experts to start with an idea of the tool. After that initial learning curve, it would become much easier, like a piece of cake. Proper training is essential for success. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
The solution is easy to learn. I advise others to understand their business requirements before making the purchase decision. They can also opt for tools like Katalon. I rate the solution a seven out of ten because of the complexity of C-Sharp language. They should include Python language instead.
Ranorex Studio does not require any maintenance but our software does. My advice to others implementing this solution is for them to take it slowly, make sure to get everything right in the beginning, and then everything should be running smoothly. I rate Ranorex Studio an eight out of ten.
I rate Ranorex Studio a nine out of ten.
The solution has good quality and functionality but I would not recommend it because of its unfamiliarity in the market. I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I think it's a good tool, I would definitely, recommend it. I would rate Ranorex Studio an eight out of ten.
I'd rate Ranorex Studio eight out of 10. It works well for us. We can quickly add service agents wherever we need to so we can run multiple scripts in parallel. It runs pretty strongly. As I said, it just doesn't have all the bells and whistles of a UFT, but then again, it's a fraction of the cost. I have some advice for people thinking about using Ranorex. If they're looking at using multiple users, they should consider having their codebase in Bitbucket or something other than Ranorex's proprietary solution. When we first stood this up, they didn't have a feed. They didn't have APIs in Bitbucket or anything else. But now that they do, we would probably be looking to migrate all of our code to Bitbucket or some other repository, so our IT system backs everything up. The options are that or Ranorex's cloud-based solution. The main advantage of Bitbucket is security. So, if your system goes down, you have copies of the system backed up somewhere else. All of our codebase across the organization is managed through Bitbucket and also backed up securely. So we have all our security protocols in place for there. Ranorex's repository plays well with other platforms so that we could use those scripts somewhere else. The only other way to do it is by running them, recording them off something else, and then going back in and re-coding where we need to code to make it work. It's not real friendly to work with multiple teams if you do a single instance setup. So, if you were an organization looking at multiple users, I would recommend looking at the right solution on how numerous teams could use the coding of it and the run-time elements of Ranorex.
My advice for anybody who is considering Ranorex is that it is a powerful tool, it is far-reaching, and it works as advertised. In my opinion, it is one of the best tools available in the market. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Having a local reseller who already knows the product and can provide in-house training would be a fantastic solution and would make the learning curve a quicker process. The transfer of knowledge from one person to another. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
We are using the on-premises deployment model. I would recommend people try the solution. They have a 30-day free trial that an organization could use to test them out. Make sure to watch the webinar before implementing the solution, even if they are experimenting with automating. It will make everything easy to understand. Ranorex has a lot of options which you need to understand and to optimize. You can't automate the optimization, which is why the webinar is so important. I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the product as an eight for what it does for us. For those people in the market looking for an application testing solution, I would recommend evaluating the product and the type of projects you will need it for. I would recommend making an evaluation and comparison with other products to be sure that the needs for testing can be covered in the functionality of the Ranorex. The Ranorex is a studio, of course, so you will have lots of options to apply in ongoing test management and test automation. In my experience, those issues are all covered in Ranorex.
I would rate this solution an eight out of 10 because of the expense of licenses and lack of simultaneous execution. It's limited to only one machine or computer. My advice is to compare solutions. Two years ago there were very different options in the market. Compare Katalon Studios with Ranorex.