The pricing for Azure Site Recovery isn't fixed, and it depends on factors like storage, network traffic, and resource usage. While it is not crystal clear, I have noticed it fluctuates with these variables. This flexibility makes it a bit challenging to estimate costs accurately, but I get that this is often the case with cloud services in general.
It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication.
Sr. Sales Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-03-16T06:56:20Z
Mar 16, 2020
There are different components in pricing and for each and every component you have to check the box and you have to look for options - check if they have a front end or back end kind of licensing, those are different types of licensing that can possibly be made simpler and probably cheaper.
Disaster Recovery as a Service providers offer solutions that enable businesses to recover their IT infrastructure and data in the event of a disaster.
Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product.
The pricing for Azure Site Recovery isn't fixed, and it depends on factors like storage, network traffic, and resource usage. While it is not crystal clear, I have noticed it fluctuates with these variables. This flexibility makes it a bit challenging to estimate costs accurately, but I get that this is often the case with cloud services in general.
I would rate it as a seven out of ten in terms of costliness.
They have a license to pay.
Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap. There is a monthly service cost attached to it.
The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive.
Licensing costs are consumption-based and although it's not cheap, it's not excessively expensive.
I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers.
The pricing should be free, and I think it should not be that expensive.
It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication.
There are different components in pricing and for each and every component you have to check the box and you have to look for options - check if they have a front end or back end kind of licensing, those are different types of licensing that can possibly be made simpler and probably cheaper.