Sales Manager - Government Sector at Summit Technology Solution
Reseller
Top 10
2023-10-24T12:37:00Z
Oct 24, 2023
This solution offers seamless integration with other enterprise products, which is my area of responsibility, focusing on government sector projects. Larger enterprise projects don't pose problems. It might be suitable for small businesses as well.
Vice President of Technology at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 20
2023-04-11T10:18:00Z
Apr 11, 2023
The solution's license is expensive for Asian and Middle Eastern regions. There are additional costs involved for installation and implementation. I rate its pricing as a nine.
Datacap's price is high, but we purchased it in a bundle with our IBM Finance package, so we're not paying the market price for the individual solution.
The solution comes as a part of a bundle package. Licensing is hard to calculate. There's no real difference between the cloud and on-prem. The Kubernetes OpenShift to cloud pack is a different process. It is expensive only due to the fact that when we take it with FileNet, it is expensive.
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2022-04-12T12:56:13Z
Apr 12, 2022
IBM could offer more competitive pricing. This would allow them to attain more users. Some of our clients are considering moving to a different solution called Encapture which is similar but offers more competitive pricing.
We were using the User Value Unit licensing, which means we get charged per active user of the system, and if I'm not mistaken, we also had it for the rule runner service. They had a PVU license model, which is a processor value unit. For each process that we have in our system, we pay a certain amount of money. We found the pricing to be quite steep. It was really an expensive solution in comparison to Kofax, which had a different licensing model and was actually cheaper overall because they charge per page and not per user and per process.
IBM Datacap helps you streamline the capture, recognition and classification of business documents and extract important information. Datacap supports multiple-channel capture by processing paper documents on scanners, mobile devices, multi-function peripherals and fax. It uses natural language processing, text analytics and machine learning technologies, like those in IBM Watson, to automatically identify, classify and extract content from unstructured or variable documents. The software can...
This solution is the most expensive in the market.
This solution offers seamless integration with other enterprise products, which is my area of responsibility, focusing on government sector projects. Larger enterprise projects don't pose problems. It might be suitable for small businesses as well.
The solution's license is expensive for Asian and Middle Eastern regions. There are additional costs involved for installation and implementation. I rate its pricing as a nine.
Datacap's price is high, but we purchased it in a bundle with our IBM Finance package, so we're not paying the market price for the individual solution.
The solution comes as a part of a bundle package. Licensing is hard to calculate. There's no real difference between the cloud and on-prem. The Kubernetes OpenShift to cloud pack is a different process. It is expensive only due to the fact that when we take it with FileNet, it is expensive.
IBM could offer more competitive pricing. This would allow them to attain more users. Some of our clients are considering moving to a different solution called Encapture which is similar but offers more competitive pricing.
We were using the User Value Unit licensing, which means we get charged per active user of the system, and if I'm not mistaken, we also had it for the rule runner service. They had a PVU license model, which is a processor value unit. For each process that we have in our system, we pay a certain amount of money. We found the pricing to be quite steep. It was really an expensive solution in comparison to Kofax, which had a different licensing model and was actually cheaper overall because they charge per page and not per user and per process.
Pricing of the solution is reasonable.
Pricing depends on how much we use it. We pay per bulk quantity. We pay as you go. Therefore, it sort of depends on our usage of it.
Pricing needs to stay competitive.