The price of this solution is competitive compared to the other cloud-based database services. There is also a free tier available that provides up to 512 MB of storage and allows users to experiment with the service before committing to a paid plan. For licensing, if we use it to build an application, we may be required to release the source code of our application under SSPL. The SSPL is a copyleft license that requires users who offer this solution as a service to release the source code of their application under the same license.
Big Data Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 5
2023-02-17T18:32:00Z
Feb 17, 2023
For me, MongoDB Atlas could be expensive as every cloud service because I don't have many other terms of comparison, but I think it is not so expensive for customers. In the end, they may be able to save money rather than buy it on-premise however, on-premise, they do not have access to all the features that Atlas exposes. The costs are similar to having a cloud provider and if we look at the short-term, there is a real saving of money investing in their service instead of making it on-prem in the same scenario.
MongoDB Atlas is more cost-effective than Amazon DocumentDB. It also has a pay-as-you-go pricing model. Apart from the standard licensing cost, you must also pay to get MongoDB Atlas technical support, which is expensive. MongoDB Atlas has different pricing models, so pricing is five out of ten for storing the data. The support is expensive, so that's three out of ten. For data updates, I'd give the price seven out of ten.
Comparing the price between the MongoDB and Microsoft SQL Server, we are using the enterprise edition of Microsoft SQL Server, which is more expensive than MongoDB. I would rate the price of MongoDB 4 out of 5.
You do get what you pay for. The solution isn't overly expensive. We don't have any subscriptions that I know of. We are paying for document DB, which is a clone of MongoDB. That's part of our whole solution.
Deputy CTO at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-06-25T22:40:55Z
Jun 25, 2021
The solution is expensive overall. It does not require a license but if you want the support then you will need to purchase the license. They use a pay-as-you-go model and you are able to receive some discounts by making longer usage commitments.
Senior Project Manager - IT Services at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-12-25T12:20:00Z
Dec 25, 2020
If you understand cloud computing, there is nothing called licensing. They call it a service - we are getting software as a service. We are not getting any licenses for that. If you need a service today, you use that service today, and if you don't require it tomorrow, you will discontinue with it. So you will not incur any costs from the licensing side. You will just pay as you go, that's it.
Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
MSP
2018-12-11T08:31:00Z
Dec 11, 2018
Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was easy and seamless. We chose the AWS Marketplace because it is a brand name and a popular product. It is too expensive. They need to work on this.
Senior Application Developer at Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
Real User
2018-12-05T07:52:00Z
Dec 5, 2018
Our purchasing experience on the AWS Marketplace was great. We chose to go through the AWS Marketplace as a small team; my team selected it, and we consist of three people. The pricing and licensing is great.
MongoDB Atlas is a developer data platform that provides a tightly integrated collection of data and application infrastructure building blocks to enable enterprises to quickly deploy bespoke architectures to address any application need. Atlas supports transactional, full-text search, vector search, time series and stream processing application use cases across mobile, distributed, event-driven, and serverless architectures.
A key advantage of MongoDB Atlas is flexibility - it makes it easy...
The product has a yearly subscription.
I don't have any concerns about MongoDB Atlas pricing and licensing.
MongoDB Atlas provides good value for money. MongoDB Atlas is not expensive, and since it's a cloud-based solution, you pay by usage.
I did not get into the solution's licensing costs since that is taken care of by the customers who want to use the product.
The solution is fairly priced. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
The solution is fairly priced.
The price of MongoDB Atlas is highly expensive to use and maintain. They are taking advantage of the users with such a high price.
The price of this solution is competitive compared to the other cloud-based database services. There is also a free tier available that provides up to 512 MB of storage and allows users to experiment with the service before committing to a paid plan. For licensing, if we use it to build an application, we may be required to release the source code of our application under SSPL. The SSPL is a copyleft license that requires users who offer this solution as a service to release the source code of their application under the same license.
For me, MongoDB Atlas could be expensive as every cloud service because I don't have many other terms of comparison, but I think it is not so expensive for customers. In the end, they may be able to save money rather than buy it on-premise however, on-premise, they do not have access to all the features that Atlas exposes. The costs are similar to having a cloud provider and if we look at the short-term, there is a real saving of money investing in their service instead of making it on-prem in the same scenario.
I'm not familiar with the cost of MongoDB Atlas.
MongoDB Atlas is more cost-effective than Amazon DocumentDB. It also has a pay-as-you-go pricing model. Apart from the standard licensing cost, you must also pay to get MongoDB Atlas technical support, which is expensive. MongoDB Atlas has different pricing models, so pricing is five out of ten for storing the data. The support is expensive, so that's three out of ten. For data updates, I'd give the price seven out of ten.
I believe when it is deployed publicly, it is pretty cheap. But the costs are high if it is deployed on-premises or you're using a private database.
We pay for the license on a monthly basis. It's not cheap or expensive. For smaller companies, it's definitely expensive.
We pay for a license.
Comparing the price between the MongoDB and Microsoft SQL Server, we are using the enterprise edition of Microsoft SQL Server, which is more expensive than MongoDB. I would rate the price of MongoDB 4 out of 5.
You do get what you pay for. The solution isn't overly expensive. We don't have any subscriptions that I know of. We are paying for document DB, which is a clone of MongoDB. That's part of our whole solution.
The solution is expensive overall. It does not require a license but if you want the support then you will need to purchase the license. They use a pay-as-you-go model and you are able to receive some discounts by making longer usage commitments.
We pay for licensing on a monthly basis and we are fine with the cost.
If you understand cloud computing, there is nothing called licensing. They call it a service - we are getting software as a service. We are not getting any licenses for that. If you need a service today, you use that service today, and if you don't require it tomorrow, you will discontinue with it. So you will not incur any costs from the licensing side. You will just pay as you go, that's it.
Pricing could always be better.
Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was easy and seamless. We chose the AWS Marketplace because it is a brand name and a popular product. It is too expensive. They need to work on this.
The pricing is good. We originally chose it over DynamoDB because of the pricing.
The purchasing process through the AWS Marketplace was very good.
Our purchasing experience on the AWS Marketplace was great. We chose to go through the AWS Marketplace as a small team; my team selected it, and we consist of three people. The pricing and licensing is great.