We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story
2019-03-11T07:21:00Z

What needs improvement with Akamai Kona Site Defender?

16

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Akamai Kona Site Defender.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
55 Answers

author avatar
Top 5Real User

The product really isn't very user-friendly. They could improve it so that it's easier for their customers to navigate and use. From a management perspective, it's difficult. Managing these rules with the product isn't easy. It is not taking into account that this might be used by somebody who doesn't necessarily excel in IT. It should be more accessible to everyday users. For example, report generation should be much simpler to handle. It shouldn't be a complex task. The pricing could be reduced a bit. They should provide an image optimizer and have it included within the package due to the fact that ultimately all websites that have high content are looking for this.

2021-03-29T20:41:41Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

I think there could be an improvement with the integration of more features for each security. Possibly inline IPS and more granularity for configuration. I'd like to see incremental or integrated security features or maybe even for our transit anti-malware. It goes hand in hand with things like DLP.

2020-06-08T06:11:08Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

The interface is a little bit clunky and can be improved. It takes a while to get from here to there.

2020-01-26T09:26:00Z
author avatar
Real User

The WAF features definitely have a lot of room for improvement. A lot of the WAF is really basic. For some products or some of our solutions, we need to run a second layer of more advanced WAF. If it had better layer seven protection then we would not need a second WAF. We use Akamai because it's good at what it does. There are some other things that we would like it to be good at and it's not that good. Quality of protection is our primary concern. We need more advanced layer seven protection, SQL injection, applied scripting, and more confidence in the precision of the system. I think all of those things would be very useful for us.

2019-08-18T07:52:00Z
author avatar
Real User

* I would like to see some non-related reputation categories. If they had some way of detecting activity on their platform, that would be helpful. * Web request analytics is hard to do between them and us. * There are some issues with pushing configurations across a network. It still takes about 20 minutes and that means to retract it's another 20 minutes. * Also, some of their monitoring dashboards that show us what's hitting us, and with which we analyze, have room for improvement.

2019-03-11T07:21:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai, Amazon, Imperva and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: October 2021.
542,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.