Electrical Validation Engineer at Intel Corporation
Real User
2019-02-04T08:29:00Z
Feb 4, 2019
For the next release, I would like more explanation on Taps. E.g., what's the impact on the signal when we click on a feature or click on a Tap. It would be good if we have more capabilities on Taps. Right now, it's a minimal tool. They could make it more dynamic by adding dynamic features, which could help us with doing effective analysis.
Sometimes, the forms keep changing because of new product technology. If they could reduce the amount of change in the form, this would be good. A lot more improvement can be done on the PAM-4 part.
IC Validation Engineer at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2019-02-04T08:29:00Z
Feb 4, 2019
The user interface is somewhat difficult when it comes to updates, so this is something that they need to improve. I would like a better GUI with navigation. This should make it easier to compare to competitors, like Textronix or Keysight.
While the user interface is good, it's a bit complicated because they have so many tabs. If they could simplify it, this would be helpful and appreciated. In the next release, they could make the capability to inject things, like RM noise. This will enable us to test the interference tolerance.
Researcher at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
2019-02-04T08:28:00Z
Feb 4, 2019
I would like the frequency range to be extended because of the speed. Electronics are moving forward to higher speeds, so it's better to have higher frequencies. The product's antennas and radar applications need improvement.
SI Engineer at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees
Real User
2019-02-03T07:05:00Z
Feb 3, 2019
I think it's available, but the eye diagram is an extra tool that is very expensive. Having it would save me time because, instead of having to simulate, I could see it from the measurement really fast. That would be one less step. I would like to see them improve the software. The new version can be improved. It's not quite stable. It restarts a lot.
For the next release, I would like more explanation on Taps. E.g., what's the impact on the signal when we click on a feature or click on a Tap. It would be good if we have more capabilities on Taps. Right now, it's a minimal tool. They could make it more dynamic by adding dynamic features, which could help us with doing effective analysis.
Sometimes, the forms keep changing because of new product technology. If they could reduce the amount of change in the form, this would be good. A lot more improvement can be done on the PAM-4 part.
The user interface is somewhat difficult when it comes to updates, so this is something that they need to improve. I would like a better GUI with navigation. This should make it easier to compare to competitors, like Textronix or Keysight.
While the user interface is good, it's a bit complicated because they have so many tabs. If they could simplify it, this would be helpful and appreciated. In the next release, they could make the capability to inject things, like RM noise. This will enable us to test the interference tolerance.
I would like the frequency range to be extended because of the speed. Electronics are moving forward to higher speeds, so it's better to have higher frequencies. The product's antennas and radar applications need improvement.
I think it's available, but the eye diagram is an extra tool that is very expensive. Having it would save me time because, instead of having to simulate, I could see it from the measurement really fast. That would be one less step. I would like to see them improve the software. The new version can be improved. It's not quite stable. It restarts a lot.