We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story
2020-01-07T06:27:00Z

What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?

11

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Apache Web Server.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
44 Answers

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

I haven't really gone in deep in utilizing the full functionality of the product just yet. We just use it enough to run our application. There's probably a lot on the solution we haven't even tried. It's good enough to run and deploy our application. Therefore, I can't really speak to anything that is lacking. Things change very fast. We're always on the lookout for better approaches and tools. If the solution falls behind, we may have to switch. Nowadays, the user actually requests to do their own maintenance instead of relying on the vendor. We're looking for something that's easy to understand for the user so that they can do their own maintenance.

2021-01-27T08:52:07Z
author avatar
Top 20Consultant

The improvement can be done in the versions. Even though there are newer, stabler versions available, if you are installing from a data center, you have to install the older version. Then, installing the newer version is uncomfortable as it has to be done manually. A monitoring interface would be great for this product. The monitoring dashboards for Apache's models are not included in the basic installation. You can install the basic monitoring model, then connect this model to another monitoring system.

2020-01-12T07:22:00Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

Better integration with other environments is needed. It would be great if technical support for Apache were available in Iran. It is a very important need.

2020-01-07T06:28:00Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

The Apache Server and the Nginx load balancer are Linux based. This is good for our security. Windows has a lot of security issues. Maybe if we could find a good operator to configure it then it would be even more secure than the solution we use. But because of their support policies, for the intrusion and attacking defenses, cost, and throughput, we are going with the free scenarios, like Apache and Nginx. Maybe Windows is a good solution but we are not familiar with that. For a business that has other services related to Microsoft, it might be good sometimes if they used that. But we do not have other Microsoft services. Apache Server and the Nginx also do not require any licenses, and I think because of this that the support is not so good for us. It does not cost us money so this is a benefit for our budget. The product has a lot of experienced users and they share information. Because of this, it is possible for a company like us to find the information we need and we can use it. But the company does not have any support options in our country. We can find solutions on the websites or blogs or resources like that, but it would be nice so have a more formal support solution. As far as improvements, integration is important for us. So improving the possibilities and capabilities for integration is the first thing I would like to see. The other one is an improvement in implementation. The other one is improving the availability of support. I think also improving the GUI for the less experienced users. For some companies, it is hard to configure it if they have not had any experience. The setup is hard for them. For us it is not hard because we have experience with that, so we do not have any problem. But maybe changes to the GUI could be a benefit or become one of the advantages of this solution.

2020-01-07T06:27:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Microsoft, Zend and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: September 2021.
542,267 professionals have used our research since 2012.