What needs improvement with AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring?


Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
33 Answers

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReseller

I'm not sure I know how I would improve the solution, as I'm mostly pre-sales and sales and I don't have any deep insight into the technical side that could be improved. There needs to be the capability to modify the code for mobile. There may be some older technologies that are still covered, however, it's not as plug-and-play. You can still do it, however, it takes slightly more effort for engineers to cover old technologies such as C++, Delphi, and so on. It still can be done. It's just not as easy as, for example, covering Java. Java is just a matter of configuration and clicks.

author avatar
Top 10MSP

In terms of improvements we would like to see, we want to understand what the battery consumption metrics are whenever a user is viewing something in an app. It would be really helpful for us if we could get those details levels.

author avatar

I would like to see improvements with respect to the visibility of the network. It currently provides visibility on the application side, but not on the network layer. More visibility and granularity would improve this solution. I would like to see accommodation for millisecond granularity, as we only have one-second granularity now.

Find out what your peers are saying about AppDynamics, VMware, Aternity and others in Mobile APM. Updated: September 2021.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.