2019-04-29T10:12:00Z

What needs improvement with Cavisson NetStorm?

0

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Cavisson NetStorm.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
33 Answers

author avatar
Real User

The user interface had to be improved for the product. Its user interface should be made simple and easy to customize as per user needs. Integration with APM and log monitoring tools is good and easy but the user interface of the customization also needs improvement. One more feature which needs improvement are the ready reports. Its reports have great features but need to be customized which is not easy for a normal user. So ready reports should be given with templates which can just be used out of the box.

2020-05-26T18:23:00Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

More information could be provided on the help page. More automation could be provided in NetStorm. Need to add or support some more APIs in the Script Manager window. It is more compatible with Chrome and Firefox than other browsers, which needs improvement. Currently, it supports mostly web applications. Desktop application should support be included. NetStorm is a web based tool that works on HTTP and HTTPS Protocols. NetStorm is a powerful tool but needs more information to be available on the Internet and Youtube on how to use it.

2020-04-01T07:20:00Z
author avatar
Real User

In the next release, we are looking for a JS instrumentation feature that would be helpful in identifying client-side issues at an early stage, or during testing.

2019-04-29T10:12:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Cavisson, Micro Focus, Apache and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: June 2021.
511,773 professionals have used our research since 2012.