2018-05-25T19:19:00Z

What needs improvement with CrossBrowserTesting?

0

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with CrossBrowserTesting.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
44 Answers

author avatar
Top 5Real User

Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing. This is one of the few concerns our team has had while trying to accomplish our testing. Going forward, I'm sure improvements can be made to help alleviate some of those concerns. Expansion on automation and quicker testing is something that would greatly benefit our business needs. Smartbear has already implemented some automation on the platform that can be used and improved to fulfill our needs as well as many other users.

2020-10-29T00:23:00Z
author avatar
Real User

This solution would benefit from faster testing and support for more devices.

2020-01-06T15:48:00Z
author avatar
Real User

Automated testing could be improved. Test management feature where tests could be scripted. Data-driven testing could be added.

2019-02-06T12:22:00Z
author avatar
Top 20User

The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default. Every time, I have to select the full screen, then restart its captures, which seems a waste of time and energy. This is, admittedly, a minor complaint.

2018-05-25T19:19:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, BrowserStack, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.