Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with CrossBrowserTesting.
What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?
Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing. This is one of the few concerns our team has had while trying to accomplish our testing. Going forward, I'm sure improvements can be made to help alleviate some of those concerns. Expansion on automation and quicker testing is something that would greatly benefit our business needs. Smartbear has already implemented some automation on the platform that can be used and improved to fulfill our needs as well as many other users.
This solution would benefit from faster testing and support for more devices.
Automated testing could be improved. Test management feature where tests could be scripted. Data-driven testing could be added.
The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default. Every time, I have to select the full screen, then restart its captures, which seems a waste of time and energy. This is, admittedly, a minor complaint.
If you were talking to someone whose organization is considering CrossBrowserTesting, what would you say?
How would you rate it and why? Any other tips or advice?
Let the community know what you think. Share your opinions now!