What needs improvement with Dell EMC Vscale Architecture?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Dell EMC Vscale Architecture.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

11 Answer

author avatar

In terms of what could be improved, I particularly think the scope of automation is very much limited. So they should introduce some more STK's and APIs for automation first thing. Secondly, in terms of Vscale Architecture, they should have some evangelists. When I go to the community for VMware ESXi or NSX, I get lots of information online everywhere because community members are talking, evangelists are talking. Additionally, I usually have a lot of KV articles and lot of community articles I can read and sort out the minor issues. But, in terms of Vscale, you need to be very mature in all aspects of the technology and when you get disturbed, you have to go through the entire documentation to figure things out. I think I heard this from one or two customers as well. Their resources are not able to find much online support for Vscale. As for what should be included in future releases, customers are looking for a unified management console, which they have, but the console should be more user-friendly. Secondly, they should have more scope of orchestration. Thirdly, regarding monitoring, there should be a built-in monitoring engine like we have in Nutanix. These are the things customers complain about sometimes.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell EMC, IBM, FlexPod and others in Converged Infrastructure. Updated: November 2020.
448,542 professionals have used our research since 2012.