Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines.
What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?
This product is not as easy to use as some other solutions. In the future, I would like to see this solution to be easier to use and deploy. More customers would be attracted to this solution if it were cheaper in price. It would be helpful if this solution also worked on other types of SAS products. There are many types of these products available and it is not possible to replicate all of them. If would be great to have a unique solution for replicating data across all storage. In the next release of this software, I would like to see options that help to decrease the bandwidth required, such as compressing the data.
The operation of this solution in a production environment data center can be improved. I would like to see integration with EMC NetWorker in the next release.
We all know it's really hard to get good pricing and cost information.
Please share what you can so you can help your peers.
I am doing a study for Disaster Recovery Software solutions in the market.
The software must be capable of migrating virtual and physical systems to the Disaster Recovery site, also of managing the data replication.
It should be able to do Disaster Recovery Test Simulation and full Fail-Back Testing.
Finally, it should support hardware and software in heterogeneous environments.