2019-10-28 06:33:00 UTC

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiExtender?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Fortinet FortiExtender.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

22 Answers

author avatar
Top 10Real User

The solution would be a lot better if it was a little bit more intuitive. Additionally, the help menu would be a lot better if it was easier to identify the items that I was looking for. I find the graphical interface a little bit difficult to navigate. And I find the font that is used on the HTML interface not conducive to being able to be read in low light situations.

2020-03-05 08:39:00 UTC
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

The engineering of the solution has some negative points, especially in terms of troubleshooting. It's difficult to troubleshoot when we have a problem. It's not like other products like Cisco or Palo Alto which make troubleshooting much easier. The solution should offer better monitoring, like Palo Alto, which uses the monitoring feature to help you find a problem. Palo Alto also offers a packet tracer to give you the opportunity to test your configuration before you use it. That way, you can try a configuration you are not sure about it. Fortinet, in my opinion, can do more at this point.

2019-10-28 06:33:00 UTC
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Ubiquiti Networks, Cisco and others in Wireless WAN. Updated: June 2020.
427,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.