We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story
2019-10-13T05:48:00Z

What needs improvement with IBM PowerVM?

2

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with IBM PowerVM.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
1010 Answers

author avatar
Real User

This solution is lacking the ability to have servers act as a cluster, such as in VMware. IBM has come out with a feature similar to VMware's vCenter but it is not as mature. They need to add LPM shared-nothing feature, such as in vMotion. IBM is a hardware company. They have always had the view of, why implement something in software that I can implement in hardware. The virtualized hardware can do many things whereas these other vendors are software vendors that can only work on hardware. However, this sometimes makes IBM less advanced in terms of software because they rely more on the hardware. That is why they need to look at VMware as a model for advancing their PowerVC offering to match VMware's vCenter. Similar to what Red Hat did. Red Hat Manager is very close to vCenter, they are trying to mimic the options.

2021-06-12T19:49:34Z
author avatar
Real User

Whenever you go to the virtualization, you may experience performance issues. They need to better cater to virtualization with respect to performance. I'm not saying I'm facing any performance issue, however. It's more of a theoretical concern, as people say you have to compromise with respect to the performance whenever you move to virtualization. The licensing could be better. The pricing and the licensing fees are very high with respect to the number of core licenses. So price factor on the Intel-based architecture is much less compared to IBM, for example. We have not confirmed their roadmap with respect to the cloud. Since IBM has acquired Red Hat, they may promote Red Hat for the cloud version. We don't know whether they are introducing AIX for their cloud platform as well or not. That we would love. Otherwise, we need to move to the Linux environment. In any case, they need to be more transparent with their plans for the cloud.

2021-05-29T10:39:13Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

A GUI version of VIOS would be a great plus for people moving from Intel-based hypervisors.

2021-05-05T19:23:00Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

Currently, it's working fine. It's not really lacking too much in the way of features. If it could actually virtualize the entire platform it might be better. If you're having more than one virtualization technology, maybe there's a way to actually have less - one technology to run the data center and maybe one special virtualization for power. If it integrated with other platforms more effectively it might be better.

2020-08-02T08:16:42Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

The performance should be improved. They should reduce the cost to purchase the hardware of the physical server.

2020-04-23T10:13:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

The interface is not user-friendly in places, so it could use some improvement. If PowerVM were cheaper then it would better compete with VMware vCenter.

2020-02-05T08:05:07Z
author avatar
Real User

The price is high. I would like for them to add more automation features.

2020-01-30T07:55:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

IBM now makes provides us with quality GUI tools to make the experience easier and successful. I don't have an issue with the current configuration or with the GUI. I worked on both with the team. I would like for IBM to be more focused on the cloud.

2020-01-29T08:35:00Z
author avatar
Real User

Any improvements that can be made in the interface will go a long way to helping us work better.

2019-10-22T04:42:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

I would like to see an improvement in the management of the program.

2019-10-13T05:48:00Z
Learn what your peers think about IBM PowerVM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.