2020-05-11T06:07:00Z

What needs improvement with IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics?

0

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
88 Answers

author avatar
Top 5Real User

This is a good product, although it does require some fine-tuning. The dashboard is pathetic and it takes a long time to perform a search. The graphics need to be improved. Providing good support is something that they need to work on. It would be helpful if IBM published more use cases.

2020-10-08T07:25:22Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

We sometimes get an error about the hard drive. Approximately once in two months, we can't find the logs, and they go missing, which is a terrible issue. We are getting support for this issue from our support company.

2020-09-27T04:10:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

The user interface and configurability of IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics can be improved. It has a lot of pre-configured settings and not many things can be changed. It also needs more integrations. Currently, User Behavior Analytics is integrated only with IBM QRadar. It could have deeper integrations. It can also have more complicated scoring models. Currently, it has a very simple linear scoring model for users.

2020-09-09T06:28:59Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

In terms of what could be improved, it would be easier if you didn't have to long escape for a bar sync. If you have to, the logs are not automatically barred, so you have to guide the whole atmosphere. Additionally, there should be integration with IBM Guardian. Lastly, there should be an extension where we can get the reports. This could be an extension to the dashboard with the Guardian or another product with limited technology, for example IPS. Now, we only have IBM. Basically, it needs more and more integration models.

2020-07-13T06:55:00Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

The price of this solution is a little bit expensive, so if it were cheaper then it would help. While the interface is easy to use, it could be a little more responsive. It can be a bit sluggish at times.

2020-06-28T08:51:00Z
author avatar
Real User

From a functionality point of view, there are issues sometimes. There is a component in QRadar where all these certifications need to be installed, like a UPN. Sometimes we experience functionality issues where the logging, indexing, and searching were not working. I have personally seen it misbehaving. Sometimes we need to restart it. In some cases when it was malfunctioning we needed to contact support to resolve the issue. I don't see any issues in the integration model with a UPN from a usability point of view, but with functionally you can experience a lot of issues.

2020-06-15T07:33:00Z
author avatar
Real User

They have to build more quantitative monitoring, profiling, and make it more predictive.

2020-05-12T05:43:00Z
author avatar
Reseller

Some of the features should be more cooperative but other than that, everything is okay.

2020-05-11T06:07:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Securonix Solutions, Splunk and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: September 2021.
536,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.