2019-09-11T10:12:00Z

What needs improvement with IBM Spectrum Computing?

0

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with IBM Spectrum Computing.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
33 Answers

author avatar
Top 10Real User

We are not fully satisfied with this product at the moment because we are having issues with reliability. We have not been able to use deduplication. I cannot use any protocol other than VTL. We have VTL hardware that has some additional functions there are not supported by the VTL protocol. Also, VTL is a little bit slow. For example, we use a VTL from EMC and they use another protocol for the copying. At this moment, TSM will not use a protocol that is different from IBM.

2020-11-25T04:52:32Z
author avatar
Top 10Consultant

Hyper-convergence can be improved. IBM Spectrum is not supported or compatible with Nutanix with hyper-convergence. SMB storage and HPC is not compatible and it should be supported by IBM Spectrum Computing. The GUI could be more user-friendly for the administrator. In the GUI you cannot do all of the administration tasks, you have to go to the Command-Line. In VM the GUI can handle everything, Spectrum should be like this. Also, I would like to have the Hyper-converged solution Nutanix with IBM Spectrum, it's a very good product.

2019-09-27T04:38:00Z
author avatar
Real User

This solution is no longer managing tapes correctly. I had to script another one to make the software use fewer tapes. Normally, you would have backup software tuned for speed or capacity and here, it was tuned for speed, which could be the reason for so many bad tapes.

2019-09-11T10:12:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Cloudera, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Hadoop. Updated: September 2021.
536,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.